My M1A!

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
In 69 i was at Fort Lewis basic being introduce to a M-14. Fell in love with that gun and it became an extension of my body. It became a want but not a need so never did get one until my son bought me one a month ago.
In training we were require to shoot 3 rounds under a nickel at 20-30 meters using iron sites. Some did it right away and some never did get it done. For me it took about five times.
Had some bullets so did shoot it to make sure it works and if the sites were close.

Then bought a scope mount and 100 rounds. Had high profile rings to put on and have order low profile ones. Used iron sites to set scope site. Drove out on gravel, stop, put target out at 30 big steps using end gate for support and five bullets. First two were high so next three i shot at bottom of red not sure why and did shoot rapidly. You can see the results. Have a large nickel form my boyhood in the 50s that are in a box of mine to compare with.
Goal is to shoot five rounds under a nickel at 50 yards with scope this summer in the warmth and a decent rest. I feel the rifle and bullets can do it but have doubts with me.

Son got me a M-1 about four years ago with 200 rounds. Need to order 100 more for the 7.62. Should have enough for my concerns of Canada coming down or Mexico coming up. What do you think? db
 

Attachments

20231105_093155[1].jpg 20231105_093841[1].jpg
Last edited:




Wall-eyes

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Posts
995
Likes
369
Points
253
Back in the days when my brother-in-law and I taught shooting instruction at indoor range in Montana. Through a government program we were able to buy 22 rifles cheap and M1 grands with ammo for around $500 I believe it was. He still does shooting range thing and price went up to $1,000 but cannot not get them BO or some BS. I have a few to say the least. The best part was bulk ammo 223 was about 2 to 3 cents a round. Boy was I a bad boy stocked up for WW3. I remember those M1's kick really good like 30- 06 always did.
 

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
Nobody asked about my larger nickel from the 50s.
Yes, the M-14 is a much easier rifle to fire/handled than the M-1. 100 rounds of 7.62 were $1/round. db
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
17,106
Likes
2,525
Points
783
Location
Here
You going to hunt with it? What's the deal with the nickel? :)
 

Fishmission

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Posts
2,810
Likes
73
Points
278
Looks like a liberty head V nickel. 1896. I’m wrong Actually, looks like a Morgan silver dollar now that i zoomed zoomed in on the laptop. If I guessed right do I win it?
 
Last edited:

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
Winner. Morgan and you win only bragging rights. I have a number of them from gifts from various relatives as a young boy. Not sure if i will be able to get 5 bullets under a nickel but summer will tell. I believe the V nickel is larger than today's nickels so need to find one of them there. db
 


db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
20231106_131516[1].jpg
20231106_131603[1].jpg
20231106_131613[1].jpg
20231106_131608[1].jpg

Besides the M-1 and M-14 have a Krag that i bought from the Legion i belong to. They bought in the late twenties for under $2 and were ship up here by rail. Action is so smooth i feel it will close itself.
Also, since i can remember my dad had an1873 Springfield that he said was use in the Little Big Horn battle. Problem is according to the serial number was made in 1881. Did buy some bullets and did put in the chamber but was scared to pull trigger. Very. very well worn but no rust. Missing some parts. Barrel is a little over 21 inches and front site is wrong. Barrel groves are not right so do not know what it is. I think maybe a rifle cut down. Never did ask dad the history so that is in the grave now. So on the wall and a Springfield that was in the Custer battle. db
 
Last edited:

Fishmission

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Posts
2,810
Likes
73
Points
278
Winner. Morgan and you win only bragging rights. I have a number of them from gifts from various relatives as a young boy. Not sure if i will be able to get 5 bullets under a nickel but summer will tell. I believe the V nickel is larger than today's nickels so need to find one of them there. db
Beautiful coins. I think I have two. One is an 1884 and the other one is in 1878 I believe.
agreed. Wouldn’t mind having a V nickel.
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
17,106
Likes
2,525
Points
783
Location
Here
So...you going to hunt with the M-14? Hornady makes some damn fine 150's which "should" shoot into a dime.

1699323852676.png
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
17,106
Likes
2,525
Points
783
Location
Here
^^^^This is from experience from a Ruger American a couple years ago. Being an auto your experience may vary. Being as the 7.62 groups were more than decent; I believe it's worth a try!
 

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
No to hunting and if i were to hunt big game i have an old Mark 5 Weatherby 300. Made in 59. Not sure if a 20-round clip is legal or ethic. I would think the Weatherby would outshoot the 14.

But my love for guns is the gun before the hunt. I feel in time, this rifle will see a lot of bullets go through it. May take a lot to get to where my goal is, and the bullet can break or not break me. If there, then on to 100 yards.

As i read some say a 308 bullet does not work or should not be used in a 7.62 and vice versus.
What is the real story if there is a right story?

Appears there is some difference, maybe in construction and maybe depends on who makes it but, in the end, it is all the same fricking bullet. No/yes. db
 
Last edited:


svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
17,106
Likes
2,525
Points
783
Location
Here
Ummm...You know I love ya DB...You can get shorter mags and there is no law to fill them...

In my years I've found a third shot is mostly desperation and noise.

The 5.56/.223 "controversy" is reversed in 7.62/.308 Win. Your modern rifle is easily able to handle the minor increased pressure of .308 as would a 'Nam M14: Springfield Armory DOES NOT want lawsuits.

Kill a deer with the damn thing!!

SD does NOT like this: If you group 3in high @100 you can hold "dead on" from the muzzle to 300ish and impact within an 8in circle.

Whack a deer with it for your boy!! A .300 doesn't make something "extra" dead.

Anyways: Have fun, be safe, God Bless and GOOD LUCK.
 

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
As i read more i do not really have a M14 but a rifle that looks and acts like a M14.
Make sure to use a bullet mark 7.62x51 maybe NATO and not 308. So, i will go with that.

All bullets will kill it just what one believes in. thanks for the help. db
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
17,106
Likes
2,525
Points
783
Location
Here
That warranty statement is legalese CYA retardation.

A .308 won't hurt your gun and SA should have the balls to declare it. The dimensions are the "same":

Enjoy your new rifle in the manner you choose. It's cool.
 
Last edited:

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,117
Likes
1,137
Points
473
Location
ND
Again, thanks for all the comments on here. It was all helpful and appreciated. db
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 190
  • This month: 153
  • This month: 142
  • This month: 137
  • This month: 113
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 88
  • This month: 84
  • This month: 78
Top Bottom