Good Looking 03 Springfield Build

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
18,416
Likes
3,419
Points
933
Location
Here
I think the guy is from Antler. Caveat on '03's: There's a range of serial#'s which weren't heat treated properly and are potential bombs (literally).

 


db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,127
Likes
1,213
Points
483
Location
ND
Told years ago, certain 03 can blow so watch your serial number.
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
18,416
Likes
3,419
Points
933
Location
Here
Profile photo for Paul Feist
Paul Feist
NRA instructor, Life Member, Gun Collector, Competitive Shooter and Author:

Here’s the deal with “low numbered” 1903 Springfield rifles…Yes, serial numbers below 800,000 from Springfield, and below 300,000 from Rock Island, may have been subjected to overheating and are thus weakened and potentially life threatening bombs to fire.

The real question is; what do I mean “May” have been?

Well, not every 1903 in those low number ranges was subjected to the overheating. Quite a number of the ones that were, blew up in the faces of soldiers - which is how the problem came to light in the first place!

More were hardness tested (which can weed out SOME of the defective ones, but cannot detect ALL of the defective ones! If it cracks when you put the hardness tester to it, it’s definitely bad, but if it doesn’t, it’s not definitely good!). The real unresolved question is this: Are you willing to bet your life that the rifle you have your face up against isn’t one of the 5–10% of the defective rifles that could kill you?

I’m not. And I’m reckless!


I would very dearly love a low numbered rifle, because I do not have a 1903, and I need one to go with my 1903A3… and I want the WWI era 1903. But I don’t dare buy myself one… because I’d want to shoot it, and even though there is only a less than 10% chance it’s defective, I don’t want my eyeball popped like a grape by a bolt coming back in my face, or to lose fingers when the receiver ring lets go.

The defective rifles don’t always let go on the first shot, either. They can be fired for decades, and then one day, people are running around yelling “find his ear! Stop the bleeding! Call a gunsmith, uh, I mean ambulance!”.

It’s a damn shame we condemn ALL “low numbered” 1903 rifles because of a few that were overheated and ruined - but it’s the safe and sane way to go. Sure do love the WWI era Springfields, though!
 
Last edited:

db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,127
Likes
1,213
Points
483
Location
ND
Read on the internet the risk is low so no big deal unless one blows up on you.
Dad had one for a time but never ever fire it as far as i know as he knew of the problem.
Our legion used them until we got some m-1. Shot the gun with blanks and never a problem. Before them legion had krags so not sure on their numbers, but they were given to certain members. No idea where they are now.
Wonder if one can get one before the 30-06 came to be? db
 

svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
18,416
Likes
3,419
Points
933
Location
Here
1666148886830.png
 


db-2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Posts
4,127
Likes
1,213
Points
483
Location
ND
Guess i will never own one no matter the number. db
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 252
  • This month: 243
  • This month: 80
  • This month: 80
  • This month: 62
  • This month: 50
  • This month: 44
  • This month: 39
  • This month: 39
  • This month: 38
Top Bottom