U.S. appeals court finds that Texas voter ID law is discriminatory 8 / 19
Reuters
By Jon Herskovitz and Lawrence Hurley52 mins ago
SHARE
TWEET
SHARE
EMAIL
[h=4]Rep. Mark Takai dies at 49[/h]
[h=4]Lawyer: Show has new evidence[/h]
© Eric Gay/AP Photo FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A federal appeals court is set to take a second look at a strict Texas voter ID law that was… AUSTIN, Texas/ WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) - A Texas law requiring voters to show a government-issued form of photo identification before casting a ballot is discriminatory and violates the U.S. Voting Rights Act, a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday ruled.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a close decision among a special 15-judge panel, also sent the case back to a district court to examine claims by the plaintiffs that the law had a discriminatory purpose.
The New Orleans-based Fifth Circuit, which has a reputation as one of the most conservative federal appeals courts, asked the district court for a short-term fix to be used in Texas in the November general election.
Critics of the law and others like it passed in recent years in Republican-governed states said similar statutes are intended to make it harder for minorities such as African-Americans and Hispanics who tend to back Democrats to vote. Backers of these laws say they are necessary to prevent voter fraud.
The court ruled 9-6 that the law had a discriminatory effect. The judges were divided differently on other parts of the ruling.
"We acknowledge the charged nature of accusations of racism, particularly against a legislative body, but we must also face the sad truth that racism continues to exist in our modern American society despite years of laws designed to eradicate it," the court said.
Challengers of the Texas law say that up to 600,000 people would be unable to vote if the law was fully in effect.
The law passed in Republican-dominated Texas was one of the strictest voter ID laws in the United States.
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Tuesday softened that state's law, saying people without a photo ID should be able to vote in November if they agree to sign an affidavit explaining why they could not obtain identification.
A federal appeals court is expected to rule soon on a similar law in North Carolina. A district court judge upheld the measure in April.
"Preventing voter fraud is essential to accurately reflecting the will of Texas voters during elections, and it is unfortunate that this common-sense law, providing protections against fraud, was not upheld in its entirety," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said in a statement.
Others applauded the court's ruling.
"No American should ever lose their right to vote just because they don't have a photo ID. This is an enormous victory for voters in Texas," said Myrna Pérez, deputy director of the New York University School of Law Brennan Center's Democracy Program, which describes itself as a nonpartisan law and policy institute.
By Jon Herskovitz and Lawrence Hurley52 mins ago
SHARE
TWEET
SHARE
[h=4]Rep. Mark Takai dies at 49[/h]
[h=4]Lawyer: Show has new evidence[/h]
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a close decision among a special 15-judge panel, also sent the case back to a district court to examine claims by the plaintiffs that the law had a discriminatory purpose.
The New Orleans-based Fifth Circuit, which has a reputation as one of the most conservative federal appeals courts, asked the district court for a short-term fix to be used in Texas in the November general election.
Critics of the law and others like it passed in recent years in Republican-governed states said similar statutes are intended to make it harder for minorities such as African-Americans and Hispanics who tend to back Democrats to vote. Backers of these laws say they are necessary to prevent voter fraud.
The court ruled 9-6 that the law had a discriminatory effect. The judges were divided differently on other parts of the ruling.
"We acknowledge the charged nature of accusations of racism, particularly against a legislative body, but we must also face the sad truth that racism continues to exist in our modern American society despite years of laws designed to eradicate it," the court said.
Challengers of the Texas law say that up to 600,000 people would be unable to vote if the law was fully in effect.
The law passed in Republican-dominated Texas was one of the strictest voter ID laws in the United States.
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Tuesday softened that state's law, saying people without a photo ID should be able to vote in November if they agree to sign an affidavit explaining why they could not obtain identification.
A federal appeals court is expected to rule soon on a similar law in North Carolina. A district court judge upheld the measure in April.
"Preventing voter fraud is essential to accurately reflecting the will of Texas voters during elections, and it is unfortunate that this common-sense law, providing protections against fraud, was not upheld in its entirety," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said in a statement.
Others applauded the court's ruling.
"No American should ever lose their right to vote just because they don't have a photo ID. This is an enormous victory for voters in Texas," said Myrna Pérez, deputy director of the New York University School of Law Brennan Center's Democracy Program, which describes itself as a nonpartisan law and policy institute.
