Depredation tags should not be awarded until the landowner has shown that they have made an honest attempt at cutting down their wildlife numbers and conflict. That should include providing hunting opportunity to the public and taking advantage of the hay yards offered by the state. I've had these conversations at length with uncles that before the last couple of years have housed hundreds of deer in their hay yards all winter. It's real easy to find people (especially kids!) to come and knock down an easy doe on the land owner's terms.
^^^^^this 1000%^^^^
Majority of the landowner in this state do not have herds that stay on their land exclusively, to punish them because of the neighbors is wrong way to keep the peace between sportsman and landowner. There only obligation as a landlord is to allow access to their herds if they want to kill their own by way of a gratis.
You do realize that this is going to happen to other wildlife in north dakota, the agreement for getting a gratis tag for deer was for compensation for loss of property. People who own land are becoming smaller and smaller in north dakota and more land is being posted every year because of it. You start threatening land owners who are doing their only requirements to allowing hunters to shoot an elk on their land is for a gratis tag. Save this comment for your memories banks because like it or not wildlife numbers are not going to go down in certain areas if we don't keep the peace with the landowners who are nice enough to allow hunting on their land. It's the ndgf responsibility to manage herds in north dakota and as we can tell they have done a piss poor job of it since the inception of it.