What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
DUI Attorney
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 498061" data-attributes="member: 337"><p>never mind, I got my answer <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🥴" title="Woozy face :woozy_face:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f974.png" data-shortname=":woozy_face:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>A DUI (or DWI/OWI) can get reduced to something like careless driving, “careless and imprudent,” negligent driving, or a “wet reckless” even with a BAC over 0.08 because the criminal charge is not automatically proven just by the number on the machine. The state still has to prove its case, and prosecutors often decide a sure conviction on a lesser traffic-style offense is better than risking a loss at trial.</p><p></p><p>“Care required” is probably a mix of two common terms: <strong>careless driving</strong> (a frequent reduction target in places like Ontario and some U.S. states) or <strong>care or control</strong> (the Canadian charge for being in a position to operate a vehicle while impaired, even if you weren’t driving). The pattern is the same in many jurisdictions.</p><p></p><h3>Why the BAC number isn’t the end of the story</h3><p>A breath or blood result over the limit is strong evidence, but it is not invincible. Common weaknesses that create bargaining room:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Problems with the stop, field sobriety tests, or how the officer described your driving versus what the dashcam/bodycam actually shows.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Breathalyzer calibration, maintenance logs, operator certification, observation period, or mouth-alcohol issues.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Timing: the “rising BAC” argument (you were still absorbing alcohol after you stopped driving, so your level at the moment of driving may have been lower).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Chain of custody or lab issues on a blood test.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Constitutional problems with the stop or rights advisements.</li> </ul><p>If those issues exist, the prosecutor faces a real chance of losing the chemical-test evidence or the whole case. A high reading makes reduction harder, especially at 0.15+ or with an accident, injury, or priors, but it does not make it impossible when the rest of the file is messy.</p><p></p><p>Some states also limit reductions by statute (Florida, for example, restricts them at 0.15+). Others have office policies that discourage or ban DUI plea-downs. It is highly local.</p><p></p><h3>What the expensive lawyer is actually buying</h3><p>It is usually not a secret handshake or a payoff. It is the ordinary machinery of plea bargaining, which resolves the large majority of criminal cases because courts cannot try everything.</p><p></p><p>A paid specialist typically:</p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Gets full discovery (reports, video, machine logs, training records) and looks for defects a public defender with 80 other files may not have time to hunt.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Files suppression motions. Even the <em>threat</em> of a hearing that could throw out the breath test changes the prosecutor’s risk calculation.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Hires a toxicologist or other expert when the science is contestable.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Presents mitigation (clean record, no crash, voluntary classes already started) so the prosecutor can justify the deal internally.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Has a reputation for actually trying cases. Prosecutors settle more readily with lawyers they know will make them work.</li> </ol><p>The money buys time, experts, investigation, and local knowledge of which prosecutors and judges will move on which kinds of cases. A lawyer who just collects a fee and immediately tells every client to plead guilty is cheaper for a reason.</p><p></p><p>There have been real corruption scandals (officers paid to no-show, guaranteed dismissals). Those are illegal and exceptional, not the normal explanation.</p><p></p><h3>The incentives on the other side</h3><p>Prosecutors are not required to reduce charges. They do it when:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The case has holes and they might lose.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The defendant is a first-timer with no aggravating facts.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Their office is buried in cases and a guaranteed resolution is administratively attractive.</li> </ul><p>The judge still has to accept the plea. The deal is not automatic.</p><p></p><p>A reduction can spare you a criminal record, mandatory ignition interlock, lengthy license revocation tied to the DUI statute, and some insurance/employment consequences. The DMV administrative suspension is often a separate track and may still happen even if the criminal charge is amended.</p><p></p><p>None of this is a loophole that “works” just because you hired someone expensive. It works when the state’s proof is imperfect <em>and</em> someone with the time and skill to exploit that is on the other side. Outcomes vary sharply by county, state, BAC, priors, and whether anyone was hurt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 498061, member: 337"] never mind, I got my answer 🥴 A DUI (or DWI/OWI) can get reduced to something like careless driving, “careless and imprudent,” negligent driving, or a “wet reckless” even with a BAC over 0.08 because the criminal charge is not automatically proven just by the number on the machine. The state still has to prove its case, and prosecutors often decide a sure conviction on a lesser traffic-style offense is better than risking a loss at trial. “Care required” is probably a mix of two common terms: [B]careless driving[/B] (a frequent reduction target in places like Ontario and some U.S. states) or [B]care or control[/B] (the Canadian charge for being in a position to operate a vehicle while impaired, even if you weren’t driving). The pattern is the same in many jurisdictions. [HEADING=2]Why the BAC number isn’t the end of the story[/HEADING] A breath or blood result over the limit is strong evidence, but it is not invincible. Common weaknesses that create bargaining room: [LIST] [*]Problems with the stop, field sobriety tests, or how the officer described your driving versus what the dashcam/bodycam actually shows. [*]Breathalyzer calibration, maintenance logs, operator certification, observation period, or mouth-alcohol issues. [*]Timing: the “rising BAC” argument (you were still absorbing alcohol after you stopped driving, so your level at the moment of driving may have been lower). [*]Chain of custody or lab issues on a blood test. [*]Constitutional problems with the stop or rights advisements. [/LIST] If those issues exist, the prosecutor faces a real chance of losing the chemical-test evidence or the whole case. A high reading makes reduction harder, especially at 0.15+ or with an accident, injury, or priors, but it does not make it impossible when the rest of the file is messy. Some states also limit reductions by statute (Florida, for example, restricts them at 0.15+). Others have office policies that discourage or ban DUI plea-downs. It is highly local. [HEADING=2]What the expensive lawyer is actually buying[/HEADING] It is usually not a secret handshake or a payoff. It is the ordinary machinery of plea bargaining, which resolves the large majority of criminal cases because courts cannot try everything. A paid specialist typically: [LIST=1] [*]Gets full discovery (reports, video, machine logs, training records) and looks for defects a public defender with 80 other files may not have time to hunt. [*]Files suppression motions. Even the [I]threat[/I] of a hearing that could throw out the breath test changes the prosecutor’s risk calculation. [*]Hires a toxicologist or other expert when the science is contestable. [*]Presents mitigation (clean record, no crash, voluntary classes already started) so the prosecutor can justify the deal internally. [*]Has a reputation for actually trying cases. Prosecutors settle more readily with lawyers they know will make them work. [/LIST] The money buys time, experts, investigation, and local knowledge of which prosecutors and judges will move on which kinds of cases. A lawyer who just collects a fee and immediately tells every client to plead guilty is cheaper for a reason. There have been real corruption scandals (officers paid to no-show, guaranteed dismissals). Those are illegal and exceptional, not the normal explanation. [HEADING=2]The incentives on the other side[/HEADING] Prosecutors are not required to reduce charges. They do it when: [LIST] [*]The case has holes and they might lose. [*]The defendant is a first-timer with no aggravating facts. [*]Their office is buried in cases and a guaranteed resolution is administratively attractive. [/LIST] The judge still has to accept the plea. The deal is not automatic. A reduction can spare you a criminal record, mandatory ignition interlock, lengthy license revocation tied to the DUI statute, and some insurance/employment consequences. The DMV administrative suspension is often a separate track and may still happen even if the criminal charge is amended. None of this is a loophole that “works” just because you hired someone expensive. It works when the state’s proof is imperfect [I]and[/I] someone with the time and skill to exploit that is on the other side. Outcomes vary sharply by county, state, BAC, priors, and whether anyone was hurt. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
RAIN!!!!
Latest: KDM
A moment ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
12 minutes ago
DUI Attorney
Latest: Davy Crockett
55 minutes ago
D
Scheels Bismarck
Latest: Downrigger
Today at 4:33 PM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Sluggo
Today at 3:28 PM
Tailrace
Latest: Allen
Today at 2:53 PM
L
Jap Beatles
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 1:40 PM
N
Soybeans
Latest: ndlongshot
Today at 1:35 PM
I
Mandan Data center pushback
Latest: Iwhackwheat
Today at 12:18 PM
Guys with a Yeti....
Latest: johnr
Today at 10:30 AM
Left Hand Remington Stocks
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 8:41 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:14 PM
Banks Stump Feeder
Latest: Shockwave
Saturday at 11:24 PM
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: Jiffy
Saturday at 9:51 PM
L
EHD is back..AGAIN!
Latest: LBrandt
Friday at 6:03 PM
D
Any youth hunter stories?
Latest: dsharp83
Friday at 12:20 PM
Sale
6.5 Creed Barrel - Savage
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 8:39 AM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: Lycanthrope
Thursday at 12:11 PM
National Grasslands Roads
Latest: Walleye Slayer
Thursday at 9:23 AM
Outdoor adventure bucket lis
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 10:32 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: CatDaddy
Wednesday at 10:12 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
DUI Attorney
Top
Bottom