Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="REY_off" data-source="post: 174276" data-attributes="member: 693">Do you even bother to read?DownVu is not &quot;spliced in&quot; sonar. DownVu uses a downward facing transducer and is essentially the same as &quot;Downscan Imaging&quot; from Lowrance.&quot;ClearVu&quot; is/was Garmins work around technology during this disputed patent infringement. What they did was use software to take what the &quot;SideVu&quot; was picking up and super impose it onto a vertical water column type picture. Now that they have won this litigation, I'm assuming they will go back to using/selling &quot;DownVu&quot;.Panoptix looks to be more useful than Lowrance's 3D Structure Scan IMO. I'm a Lowrance user, but when I purchase electronics in the future, Garmin will get a very hard look.- - - Updated - - -[MEDIA=youtube]swLA9CvIufE[/MEDIA]This. I need this.I see this as the future for ice fishing also.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="REY_off, post: 174276, member: 693"] Do you even bother to read? DownVu is not "spliced in" sonar. DownVu uses a downward facing transducer and is essentially the same as "Downscan Imaging" from Lowrance. "ClearVu" is/was Garmins work around technology during this disputed patent infringement. What they did was use software to take what the "SideVu" was picking up and super impose it onto a vertical water column type picture. Now that they have won this litigation, I'm assuming they will go back to using/selling "DownVu". Panoptix looks to be more useful than Lowrance's 3D Structure Scan IMO. I'm a Lowrance user, but when I purchase electronics in the future, Garmin will get a very hard look. [COLOR=silver][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [MEDIA=youtube]swLA9CvIufE[/MEDIA] This. I need this. I see this as the future for ice fishing also. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA