There is no such thing as “genetics that prevent them from contracting CWD”![]()
See nature's perfect culling tool in red. Only CWD infected deer are killed by CWD. Amazing! 100% of the deer with genetics that prevent them from contracting CWD survive to pass on those traits/genes to their offspring.
Oops. I forgot, you've got it all figured out, being that you're the smartest guy in the room and all. Maybe I should have said "dramatically lessen the speed at which they succumb to it" or some other phrase that you'd have a harder time dismissing or laughing at - like a jerk.There is no such thing as “genetics that prevent them from contracting CWD”
Don’t get it twisted, this has nothing to do with me or what I know or don’t know.Oops. I forgot, you've got it all figured out, being that you're the smartest guy in the room and all. Maybe I should have said "dramatically lessen the speed at which they succumb to it" or some other phrase that you'd have a harder time dismissing or laughing at - like a jerk.
Don’t get it twisted, this has nothing to do with me or what I know or don’t know.
I’m simply sharing facts and verifiable information from veterinarians and researchers. I recommend listening to the podcast episode…. And there’s more to come, so stay tuned!
But no worries!
![]()
Haha. It’s not my fault it was funny.![]()
meh... I know your type. Laugh at my replies all you want.
That won't change the fact that natural selection is hard at work - while your facts and verifiable information from the experts is doing NOTHING to make a difference.
Where did I say that? Genetics does play a role, absolutely. Just not the role you and others claim it does.To state that genetics don't play a role is simply not factual.
Is rooted in the false premise that there is a genotype with a 100% protective allele. That is simply not the case. No allele or combination of alleles has been found to provide 100% protection to date, and I believe hundreds of thousands of genetic combinations have been checked.100% of the deer with genetics that prevent them from contracting CWD survive to pass on those traits/genes to their offspring.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0017450Look at these morons, investigating the role genetics play in CWD in WTD.
https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/article/12/7/jkac109/6583187
Haven't they heard that genetics don't play a role in CWD disease progression / death and thus natural selection is useless against this scary deer zombie disease?
(insert scary dead deer pic here for fear based motivation)
Yup Brock is the one who won't discuss things.. good LordSave it. I know what your deal is Brock.
Thank you for pointing out what I am alluding to. That is precisely why I am here, to openly discuss this issue. The alternative is conspiracy theories running wild like a prairie fire.Yup Brock is the one who won't discuss things.. good Lord
Oh Fritz, being intellectually dishonest is just in your nature isn’t it?![]()
The man in the orange shirt and black cowboy hat is Shawn Schafer, Turtle Lake North Dakota. He is also the executive director of the national deer grower's association. He has had some success in getting money for CWD research. (The cooperative Agreement) He is a true believer in DNA/genomes research. He was approached by wildlife agencies saying, "you help us get our money for monitoring, we will help you get your money for research."
Now you know how/why Senator John Hoeven got involved with the Research and Management Act for $420 million December 22nd, 2022. To date, it has not been funded.
Listening to Brock and Jenn Ballard, they don't believe Shawn Schafers/Dr. Seabury's DNA/genomes theory has any merit. (Dr. Seabury using condones bred scrapie out of sheep. Sort of)
It isn't just Jenn Ballard, there is a few of these talking heads "experts" who conveniently show up. If these wildlife personnel didn't believe in Shawn Schafer/Dr. Seabury's research, then why did they ask Shawn to partner with them to drag their millions in monitoring over the finish line?
I've said it before, my apologies to sportsmen for all the new CWD rules and regulations coming.
It’s a contagious disease with documented environmental spread.https://meridian.allenpress.com/jwd...ical-Chronic-Wasting-Disease-in-PRNP-Genotype
I read this study but I'm confused about the environment of the paddock which doest tell me if this areas soil was 100 percent infected with prions.
Was the infected soil brought in to the paddock area or was this controlled area consisting of a natural existing environment to house these deer.
The food was of high quality and if so was the food tested for prions before being given to the deer?
Was a one deer infected intentionally and allowed to infect the remaining deer or was the prions in the environment the only way the deer were able to be infected?
Was the researchers able to witness by video when one infected deer was able to infect another deer by contact?
Or were all the deer who were in this controlled environment paddock infected by prions in the soils?
This study is very vague when it comes down to the smoking gun HOW WERE THE PRIONS ABLE TO INFECT THESE DEER IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT.
perhaps Brock can tell us what this peer review is lacking in context