The problem is low spots that just puddle after a rain but dry up after a couple weeks. It's just enough to drowned out crops but isn't a wetland. Those are the spots ideal for tiling and productive farmland. If the FWS would work with these landowners instead of fighting them tooth and nail for every damn inch it would go a long way to improving relations. Tile would more then likely benefit those small wetland areas they are trying to protect.if hes planting where he knows water accumulates thats a risk hes taking. Farmers know their fields and where water tends to sit for a while after rains.
if hes planting where he knows water accumulates thats a risk hes taking. Farmers know their fields and where water tends to sit for a while after rains.
Tile in any wetland will not benefit any area they are trying to protect. Think about it.The problem is low spots that just puddle after a rain but dry up after a couple weeks. It's just enough to drowned out crops but isn't a wetland. Those are the spots ideal for tiling and productive farmland. If the FWS would work with these landowners instead of fighting them tooth and nail for every damn inch it would go a long way to improving relations. Tile would more then likely benefit those small wetland areas they are trying to protect.
Tile in any wetland will not benefit any area they are trying to protect. Think about it.
temporary wetlands ("puddles") are some of the most important ones for waterfowl and alot of other wildlifeI think tile can improve certain wetlands , these look like puddles that get just wet enough to kill a crop but dry up can only grow mosquitoes , tile it to a real wetland and it improves it. Historic pictures are the only way to tell and if this case ends up in court they will make or break the lawsuit. I'm surprised farmers arn't suing each others over drain tile.