SB2137

[wct12]

Should we mention the “affiliate sportsman groups” that were lumped into the opposition’s testimony?……. Wonder how many members of some of these small town clubs know they are being used to push this narrative?

Or how many small town clubs know they got lumped into “affiliate sportsman group” without their knowledge or approval.

 

[Ericb]

This has been another sort of confusing thing for us. I think 90% of the time I’m not being snobby or condescending. Sure sometimes I laugh or make a smart ass comment, but I mean…given the arguments you and others have presented I don’t think that’s unreasonable. I try to remain light hearted about it…even when some of you are “hoping I perish” or “that were anti-hunting” or that were “lying”, or getting paid for this or the dozens of other accusations you guys like to make on FB.

And considering what you guys post on our social media posts and on here, both in regards to me and my chapter. It seems kind of hypocritical and snowflakey of you guys to get all sensitive about me getting a little condescending with you sometimes.

I mean simply stating or repeating the facts that we know to be true. Providing evidence, counter points, data, to refute misinformation and disinformation hardly seems insulting. But for some of you, there is this attitude amongst your side that thinks anyone who disagrees with you guys is personally attacking you.

This is something you guys should take a lesson in. Instead you’re playing victim because someone was condescending? Yet you guys are the ones doing all the attacking. And I haven’t whined or complained about it once…

I find some iorny here that GST's son popped up recently. Brock sounds alot like GST but from the other side.

Vollmer is probably busy looking at news boats knowing this will be bringing in the clicks$$$

 

[Fritz the Cat]

I was contacted by a company called Priogen checking with me if I wanted their services. They claim they have a live animal test. At the bottom of the home page, they say if they find prions by law, they are required to turn me in. Nice.

https://www.priogen.store/pages/tri...602&utm_medium=email&utm_source=shopify_email

In their informational they had this word Tricision unknown to me, so I looked up the meaning: Scoff

Tricision: Our custom set of econometric models using proprietary algorithms which are bedded in advanced statistical techniques and machine learning, so as to identify the customers that will maximize the revenue of a specific marketing effort – such as a catalog, flyer, or postcard.

 

[Trip McNeely]

Located out of st.paul mn…… with a website designed by a 1980s dude with a mullet….. they be lookin for that free gubement chedda…..

 

[BrockW]

Is repeating the truth bothersome to you? That whole "Live Animal" thing is a stickler, isn't it? Please answer the question BrockW. Is IHC an approved test for CWD in live animals? Seems to be a simple enough question to me guys, but oh so difficult for BrockW to answer. Even though it's extremely easy for anyone to use google to find the truth.

Pay very close attention to the response fellas.

Sorry was watching football!

No, you are correct. The protocol of RAMALT (rectal) via IHC is not USDA approved for regulatory purposes. IHC is an approved test. But RAMALT is not an approved tissue.

But in my opinion, I think this is sort of a red herring argument. The lack of “approval” means relatively little. Test accuracy/sensitivity/specificity for that protocol it 93% sensitivity in wild type deer. Meaning it misses some positive deer due to lack of sensitivity, as shown in the table below.

The reason RAMALT via IHC is not “approved” is because it’s not sensitive enough with 96S animals. Not that it’s working up positives out of thin air. 96S animals don’t accumulate prions as much or as quickly in RAMALT. Meaning those 96s animals can actually escape detection when IHC is used for that tissue, at about a 50% rate.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2681868/

 

[Obi-Wan]

Simple question from a simple mind. If, as claimed the disease is passed through saliva then why can't the saliva of a live animal be tested for the prions that " the science " says it contains instead of culling the animal and then testing it ?

 

[Fritz the Cat]

Brock, the scrapie program bred with animals above 171 condon and slaughtered animals below. This deer program is thinking cull animals below 96S and breed with animals above 96S condon. Genomes and DNA.

Do you support this genetic manipulation?