US fish and Wildlife Service

Fritz the Cat

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Posts
5,337
Likes
964
Points
483

Is The Fish and Wildlife Service Office Threatened With Closure?​

march 13, 2025 by jim fuglie, posted in uncategorized
It’s beginning to look like the rumors on the street are true: The Trump-Musk-Burgum administration is setting the wheels in motion to close the North Dakota office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
fws-office-3-25.jpg
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office in Bismarck.
I’m told that about half a dozen “probationary” employees—those who have worked for the federal agency for fewer than six months—have already been fired, and that the owner of the office building in which the FWS employees work has been told the agency wants to cancel its lease in October.
In my opinion, that would be one of the most foolish and mean-spirited things the current administration has done in its first two months in office.
I know one of those employees who’s been fired. I won’t say their name, because I don’t want to jeopardize their chances of being rehired if things change, but I can describe the profile of those who are out of work now. They’re young, college-educated wildlife professionals, some of whom relocated from states far away, uprooted their families, came here and bought houses, helped their spouses find jobs and their kids find schools, and now they’re out of work.
Some people who often know more than a little about things like this tell me that there are a whole bunch of nervous people, about 40 of them (minus those who have already been fired), who work in a building out in northeast Bismarck, who might not have a job, or a place to go to work, by the end of the year.
They are federal employees, who work for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I’ve been told that the people they work for are attempting to cancel the lease on the building they work in. It’s a nice, modern building, owned by a fellow named Pete Brendel, or by Pete and members of his family. The address is 3425 Miriam Avenue, near the corner of Divide Avenue and Bismarck Expressway, just south of the Interstate.
Pete’s not talkin’. Nor is anyone else. Here’s the lease. $35,000 a month. And the building could soon go empty. It’s a darned nice building.
pxl_20250313_115211686.jpg

I went to the Fish and Wildlife office a couple days ago and asked one of the employees if it was true that the Service was canceling its lease on their office building. “I’m sorry, I’m not allowed to comment on that,” was the response. “You’ll have to call the regional office.”
I got the name of the Regional Director, Matt Hogan, and his phone number. 303-236-7920, if you’re interested. I’ve called it three times in the last three days. Each time, the telephone receptionist told me he was in a meeting, but she would give him a message that I called.
He hasn’t returned my calls. Yet. I’m guessing he’s not returning any North Dakota phone calls these days.
Dang!
I’ll tell you what I know from various people. The Fish and Wildlife Service has told the building’s owners they want to cancel the lease before the end of the year. I think the lease runs longer than that, but I am not sure.
I’ve talked to enough people, off the record, who have talked to other people who seem to know what is going on, so I’m not afraid to share with you what I’ve learned. There is genuine fear that the Trump people are trying to shut down the FWS office in Bismarck.
Here’s the irony in that. The Fish and Wildlife Service is part of the United States Department of the Interior. You know who runs that office. A fellow named Doug Burgum.

Would Burgum really let that happen? North Dakota is a critical state for the Fish and Wildlife Service. Our state is often called “North America’s Duck Factory,” because we’re smack-dab in the middle of Prairie Pothole Country, and also because we’ve taken advantage of that by creating a giant network of National Wildlife Refuges.

North Dakota has 63 National Wildlife Refuges, more than any other state. Many of them came about because of a WPA dam-building effort here during the “Dirty Thirties.” The WPA built 114 dams on streams and creeks on farmer’s land, to provide water for livestock. Like a lot of boys my age, I grew up jumping over those little dams at sunup and shooting mallards.
But not all of them. FDR created a program to purchase easements from some of those farmers and create refuges for wildlife. The program not only saved wildlife, but saved a lot of farms during those drought years. And those refuges survived to today.
Combined with Wetland Management Districts, containing hundreds of Waterfowl Production Areas, the Fish and Wildlife Service in our state manages more than half a million acres for wildlife.

Some of the bigger refuges—Audubon, Lostwood, J.Clark Salyer, Upper Souris, Chase Lake, to name a few—have headquarters buildings and staff which manage the smaller refuges in their area. You can look at a list of the refuges here. I don’t know how many employees the FWS has in North Dakota, but they’re not just wildlife managers, there are also Federal Wardens who work alongside North Dakota State Game Wardens to enforce the law. And Chase Lake National Wildlife Refuge is home to one of North America’s largest nesting colonies of American white pelicans – nearly one-third of the continental population of these birds nest at that refuge. The nesting colony fluctuates year to year anywhere from 4,000 to 35,000 birds.

The FWS employees here are not just critical to North Dakota hunters and birders. Outdoors enthusiasts all along the Central Flyway are beneficiaries of their work. Here’s a description of their work, from their website:
“Our staff coordinate with Federal, State, Tribal, private, and non-governmental organizations and agencies as well as private landowners within North Dakota and surrounding States; frequently functioning as planners, negotiators, coordinators, and conservation advocates in an effort to fulfill our natural resource mandates.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office in Bismarck, ND may be unique in the Service in that it includes not only the Ecological Services program, but also Partners for Fish and Wildlife, Wetland Acquisition Office, the Habitat and Population Evaluation Team, Office of Law Enforcement, Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, and an archeologist for North Dakota. Having all these divisions collocated is recognized within the Service as an outstanding asset of the North Dakota Office.”
I don’t know what would happen if the Fish and Wildlife Service closed its office here. I just know it’s being talked about. But not by people who are in charge. Because of so many closed lips, I’m pretty suspicious. Especially because of what we’re reading about and hearing about what’s going on in Washington D.C. these days. If I learn anything more, I’ll let you know.

 


bravo

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
845
Likes
812
Points
338
Federal employee’s salaries and benefits from every office and agency combined come out to around 4% of the budget. Is axing them really doing anything? Especially when you consider FWS, National Park, Corps, WAPA etc. employee that are actually an economic plus?. I loved seeing alot of the USAid grants get cut, but you have to wonder why they are going after the low hanging fruit instead of all the money they keep “losing track of” overseas.

Anyway. What is the real intent here is my question. Make public lands undesirable enough to sell them off? Install a regime that’ll de-regulate logging, drilling, mining, or other restrictions? Trump’s ordered sovereign wealth fund is probably the catalyst. Fill the account with money from resources on public land. A fund that so far has no oversight or purpose other than “they may buy bitcoin”, but no details on how it will benefit anyone other than politicians.
 

Coldfront

Established Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
156
Likes
52
Points
140
First, I would like to say that I also feel sorry for anyone who loses their job during this time of correction.
The population of this country is about 350,000,000 not including illegal's as we really don't know how many there are. Our population has not grown 25% since 2023. one quarter of new hires in 2023 were hired by the government.
The picture shows a beautiful building indeed. When I built my house in 1999, I took out a 30-year loan. I have no idea how much it cost to build that building but at $341,000 for 15 years (that's about what the depreciation is on commercial buildings) that is over $5 million dollars of rent, and the government doesn't even own the building. Anyone in business would look at that say that it is not very smart move. And yes, I agree work on the waste overseas and that is happening.
 

bravo

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
845
Likes
812
Points
338
It is crazy that they rent instead of own. I don’t know the ins and outs of it, maybe they’re required to rent. It makes no difference to me where they work as long as they are effectively doing their job. This stuff seems like peanuts compared to things like overseas military and construction contracts. Those are the big fish that funny enough are being left alone.
 

Eatsleeptrap

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
1,182
Likes
3,904
Points
668
Location
Rose Hill Township
So why is there even a building in Bismarck? Probably want to be close to the capital and legislature so the can keep an eye on and stick their federal noses in state business. Just a guess. Why can't they be in one of the fancy buildings out on a refuge? In fact, if they want a central office, make it central to a region. Nebraska, North and South Dakota, Minnesota, and Montana could have a central office in Pierre and close the other four. Trim the fat. The joke there being they probably already have regional offices as well as state. Where are the concerns when Bobcat/Doosan lays a bunch of people off .Case in Fargo is laying people off RIGHT NOW. No speculation. Lions and tigers and bears, OH MY!! Everyone has a place to live and bills to pay. Go get another job for fucks sake.
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,966
Likes
1,712
Points
488
Location
Space
I feel for people losing their jobs but if its not needed cut the waste. This is no different then a corporation and lay offs on the public side. Should the feds just keep on spending and employ people just to employ them?
 

Kurtr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
19,270
Likes
3,837
Points
883
Location
Mobridge,Sd
Federal employee’s salaries and benefits from every office and agency combined come out to around 4% of the budget. Is axing them really doing anything? Especially when you consider FWS, National Park, Corps, WAPA etc. employee that are actually an economic plus?. I loved seeing alot of the USAid grants get cut, but you have to wonder why they are going after the low hanging fruit instead of all the money they keep “losing track of” overseas.

Anyway. What is the real intent here is my question. Make public lands undesirable enough to sell them off? Install a regime that’ll de-regulate logging, drilling, mining, or other restrictions? Trump’s ordered sovereign wealth fund is probably the catalyst. Fill the account with money from resources on public land. A fund that so far has no oversight or purpose other than “they may buy bitcoin”, but no details on how it will benefit anyone other than politicians.
Go out west the thousands of acres of blow down doesnt get much more undesirable. They need to get proper management up and running and not let the anti any things use the esa and as a weapon to litigate it to death. Private people do more trail maintenance than the forest service at this point i learned that the hard way in Idaho. They are going to sell public lands is a good rally call and fund raiser. WIth the amount of land that is land locked they need to find a way to sell or trade to get more of those parcels open.

M guess is going to a more privatized with contracts as its way more efficient
 


jdfisherman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Posts
237
Likes
207
Points
177
I feel for people losing their jobs but if its not needed cut the waste. This is no different then a corporation and lay offs on the public side. Should the feds just keep on spending and employ people just to employ them?
So many government jobs are nothing more than welfare, especially with so much work from home.
 

KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
9,761
Likes
2,154
Points
673
Location
Valley City
I'm sorry for the folks that lost their jobs, but follow the money. The usfws only has influence on about 4% of North Dakota land. According to my research, the usfws controls 289,000 acres of land and about 1.5 million acres of perpetual and limited easements in ND. It's probably easy to justify the fisheries end of the budget. The hatcheries and such where the fish are used nationwide so to speak. However, justifying the staff and overhead for programs that affect only 4% of the land I would guess is a bit more difficult. I don't know what the usfws budget is for ND, but I can't help but wonder what money is left for actual conservation programs after you pay salaries, electric bills, rents, fuels, transportation, and the other overhead costs given the 420k annual rent for one building. My guess the bang for their buck in ND is fairly dismal.
 


SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,216
Likes
1,089
Points
563
Involuntary job hunting is stressful.

Hopefully the folks who were probationary and were let go, are able to find employment somewhere merit-based rather than seniority based.

Everyone wants the "nut-cuttin", until it's in your own backyard.
 

Shockwave

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Posts
1,010
Likes
437
Points
278
Location
Bismarck
I just looked at the address on google maps and it appears there's 5 buildings occupied by federal agencies. I am guessing the rent is for all 5 buildings.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 135
  • This month: 61
  • This month: 48
  • This month: 42
  • This month: 41
  • This month: 40
  • This month: 36
  • This month: 35
  • This month: 33
  • This month: 27
Top Bottom