I was surprised, too. But I know the involved judge and he is, in my non legal opinion, a very fair, follow the law pretty darned tough judge. I doubt he was happy ruling as he did, but looking at a lot of of his other judgements, I suspect that there was more legal stuff to this case than meets the eye. Newspapers can’t publish all the details that come out with Thorough questioning and consideration of details, legal stuff having to do with all of our rights done by a judge.
Id let the legal system run its course. Like anything in life it might not be perfect, but it works pretty well, way better than most places on our blue planet. We get swayed by the continual “ activist judge” Thing whenever a case doesn’t go the way we might feel it should, and though that might be the case sometimes, IMO most of the “ activist judge” stuff is REAL false news.