Polluting ND

tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,669
Likes
2,110
Points
758
Location
Minot

Iron company finds perfect niche in ND​

Processing plant planned in Minot​

When the founder of North American Iron learned about North Dakota’s natural gas potential, the state bumped to the top of the company’s list of places to do business.

North American Iron has plans to construct a 730-acre pig ore processing plant in Minot’s industrial park, with a potential opening in late 2029.

Jim Bougalis, founder and CEO, spoke at the Economic Development Association of North Dakota’s fall conference in Minot Wednesday, Oct. 8.

Because of Minnesota’s regulatory environment and distance from natural gas sources, he said, he had been visiting a number of steel industry states, from Indiana to West Virginia, to find a location to turn Minnesota iron ore into pig iron for the manufacturing of steel. Then he heard about Talon Metals coming to Beulah to develop a minerals processing facility and decided he needed to check out Minnesota’s neighboring state, too.

He left a message with the North Dakota governor’s office, and less than 24 hours later, he was on the phone with the Commerce Department, hearing about the state’s excess natural gas, which his company needs in large volumes to process iron ore. Drawn by North Dakota’s proximity and the opportunity to obtain relatively inexpensive and abundant natural gas, Bougalis was soon talking with Minot Area Chamber EDC. WBI Energy has plans to construct a pipeline to bring Bakken natural gas to MACEDC’s industrial park by late 2029.

Bougalis outlined the state of the steel manufacturing industry, which is dominated by imported ore. The purest and most desirable ore is pig iron, and the U.S. supply comes entirely from other countries, he said.

“We’re competing with countries like Russia and Brazil, who have very cheap natural gas,” Bougalis said. “We’re going to have the cheapest pig iron in the world, landed here on U.S. soil, and that is a huge plus for the country, for North Dakota, for Minnesota. But it’s also a big attraction to the U.S. steel industry.”

North American Iron’s sister company, Calumet Reclamation, will be reclaiming iron ore piles from mining activity that once took place around Calumet from 1913 to 1978.

The company will ship about 4 million to 5 million tons of minimally processed iron ore to Minot to make 2 million tons of pig iron a year using proven, clean processing technologies that include a carbon sequestration process that produces 96% less carbon emissions than imported pig iron, Bougalis said.

“This was built on efficiency and profitability. It just so happens to be 96% less carbon emissions. We couldn’t do it anywhere else but North Dakota because North Dakota allows us to sequester that CO2,” he said.

The project also will bring 650 jobs to North Dakota and 150 jobs to Minnesota.

The plant will generate its own power using 250,000 decatherms of natural gas a day. The iron ore will arrive by rail eight months of the year. About 250 rail cars per day will bring iron ore to Minot and take pig iron out, Bougalis said.

“We’ll be the first and only merchant pig iron producer in the United States,” he said. “It’s a much needed product that we’re after here, that we’re producing for the U.S., for national security, for our communities.”

He noted pig iron is used by steelmakers, foundries, infrastructure contractors and in the defense industry.

He said he started North American Iron in 2021 in response to the steel industry stepping up to invest more than $20 billion into increasing domestic production. The industry’s action was prompted by the Trump administration’s 2017 tariffs on steel and aluminum. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has only increased the intensity.

“As we were increasing our steel production by 25 million tons, our feedstock dropped by 60%. Russia-Ukraine was feeding the country 60% of the pig iron. That shut off like a faucet in 2022. So, it really exacerbated the problem, which really boosted our project. You can imagine the need of the steel industry and the support from the steel industry to keep moving forward on the project,” Bougalis said.

Involving North Dakota also has helped bring the steel industry on board.

“They know it’s going to get permitted, and they know it’s going to be in a state that is open for business,” Bougalis said.

In addition to pig iron, byproducts from the proposed processing include an aggregate rock used in the concrete or aggregate industry and a sand that can be used for fill but also is being explored by the company and the University of North Dakota as a potential fertilizer, he said.

“Our goal, ultimately, is to utilize every ton of product we have on site in one shape or form,” he said.

North American Iron selected its Minot site last year and initiated its permit process. Engineering designs are on schedule and by 2027, the project should be in full construction mode, Bougalis said.

“It’s a multi-billion project,” he said. “It’s going to be a massive undertaking.”
 


tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,669
Likes
2,110
Points
758
Location
Minot

Residents worry about large livestock operations​

Some North Dakota communities are becoming more familiar with the rush to consider farms linked to industrial agriculture. Residents assisting with pushback describe the possibility of towns no longer looking the same if projects go through. North Dakota currently has nearly 100 licensed Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, where large herds of livestock are raised in confinement.

That number is well below area states, and North Dakota leaders want more livestock production. CAFOs have a history with documented air and water pollution.

Madeline Luke, agriculture committee volunteer, Dakota Resource Council, worries the industry will eventually come knocking on her community’s doorstep, impacting her surroundings.

“You go outside, the geese are flying. The air is crisp. It’s clean,” she said. “This is the North Dakota that I have come to really value, and I would be sad to see that go, I think.”

Luke volunteers with Dakota Resource Council to review CAFO permits as proposals surface elsewhere in the state. She said local organizing is often overmatched but raising enough questions for a specific project can lead to protections. Industry leaders often tout improved animal waste management and technology to limit runoff, but skeptics say making use of responsible approaches is uneven.


Luke contends she reviewed a recent permit application for a smaller CAFO seeking expansion, arguing it shouldn’t have been approved due to water standard violations, and worries about similar outcomes for even bigger farms

Marty Haroldson, director, Division of Water Quality, North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality, said his team does thorough follow-ups on complaints and works closely with applicants regarding red flags.

“I’d say that our producers do a wonderful job of complying with their permit,” he said. “There are times when things are found, and then that is when we take action to work with that facility to return any facility back to compliance.”

Local opponents often point to water quality issues in Iowa amid a major expansion of CAFOs there. Luke said she doesn’t feel reassured about any steps North Dakota and regional developers are taking to prevent that from happening in places like the Red River Valley.

“I think if they can put them there, they will see that they can put them pretty much anywhere they want,” she said.
 

Davy Crockett

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
15,380
Likes
2,655
Points
783
Location
Boondocks
“They know it’s going to get permitted, and they know it’s going to be in a state that is open for business,” Bougalis said.

It took a whole whopping 24 hours to get project approval. WOW.
Nothing like approve first and ask questions and make rules later.

Based on the oilfield regulations in this state I'd bet the farm that the iron project will be welcomed with open arms and dreams of billions $$$$$$. Then, not if but WHEN times get tough, NAI will be gone and ND citizens will be left with the mess to clean up.

MINOT, you better get the horse in front of the cart on this and hire a good lawyer firm to draw up a binding contract because one shut down in Utah back in the 60s or 70s and was a huge eyesore and environmental mess in 2010 and it was still undergoing cleanup.


Cleanup timelines for a shutdown steel smelting location typically range from a few years to several decades, and sometimes longer. Complex sites with extensive contamination may require 30 years or more, especially if groundwater treatment is necessary.
The wide variation in time is due to several key factors that must be addressed during the remediation process.
Factors influencing the cleanup timeline
  • Extent and type of contamination: Steel smelting and coking operations produce hazardous pollutants such as heavy metals (lead, mercury), asbestos, benzene, and cyanide. The concentration, type, and depth of these contaminants in the soil and groundwater are major drivers for the cleanup's scope and duration.
  • Contamination of groundwater: Addressing polluted groundwater is one of the most time-consuming aspects of site remediation. Extraction and treatment of contaminated water from an aquifer can take many years to complete.
  • Remediation method: The cleanup method selected significantly impacts the timeline.
    • Excavation and removal: Physically digging up contaminated soil and hauling it to an approved disposal site is relatively fast, but it is also one of the most costly options.
    • Containment: Capping a site with clean soil, asphalt, or buildings can effectively contain heavy metals. This method avoids active removal but requires long-term monitoring, sometimes for 30 years or more.
    • Bioremediation: Using natural or enhanced biological processes to break down organic contaminants like petroleum products is often less disruptive and cheaper, but it can take longer to complete.
  • Regulatory oversight: The involvement of regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can influence the timeline, especially if the site is designated a Superfund site due to severe contamination. Regulatory reviews and multi-phase processes can extend the overall project length.
  • Planned reuse: The planned future use of the property affects the required cleanup standards and therefore the timeline.
    • Industrial use: Leaving the land as an industrial site may allow for less aggressive cleanup, as the risk of human exposure is lower.
    • Residential use: Redeveloping the site for housing requires a much more thorough and protective cleanup due to the high risk of long-term exposure for residents, especially children.
  • Facility size and number of structures: The physical footprint of the site and the number of buildings and foundations to demolish or treat affect the project's scale. Large former plants, like the Wisconsin Steel Works, have extensive grounds to clean up.
  • Financing and funding: Securing the necessary funding for cleanup can be a lengthy process. Many steel sites are brownfields, former industrial properties that require public-private partnerships or government funding for redevelopment.
 


Davy Crockett

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
15,380
Likes
2,655
Points
783
Location
Boondocks
So is this a good or bad thing? To me it sounds good. More jobs and money coming into the state. To me needs to have money set aside with state for cleanup etc..
Them make them bond the project for a few billion , or the actual cost of cleanup then. This project is already operating on a shoestring because it's only feasible in ND ? are we giving them something for free ? I'd say that excuse is more regulatory than feasibility
 

Davy Crockett

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
15,380
Likes
2,655
Points
783
Location
Boondocks
How many jobs do you guys need ? Isn't one enough ? If you don't have a good job it's not because they arn't any out there. How many more next door neighbors do you need ?
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
2,832
Likes
2,468
Points
628
Location
Space
If its set up correctly i dont get why it would be a big issue? Set up an account for clranup if the business were to ever close or go bankrupt before allowing it to function. As fsr ad jobs go..never heard the argument of dont you have enough jobs? The more job options out there the better in my opinion.
 


Davy Crockett

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
15,380
Likes
2,655
Points
783
Location
Boondocks
If its set up correctly i dont get why it would be a big issue? Set up an account for clranup if the business were to ever close or go bankrupt before allowing it to function. As fsr ad jobs go..never heard the argument of dont you have enough jobs? The more job options out there the better in my opinion.
I guess you would like Chicago then . More jobs, more people and the % of them that are willing to work stays the same and the rest just follow along for the drug trade and what ever else they can steal or make money at besides working.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 233
  • This month: 69
  • This month: 57
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 50
  • This month: 41
  • This month: 34
  • This month: 30
  • This month: 26
  • This month: 26
Top Bottom