I got me one of them also.
I don’t think there should be a doe shot in ND for many many years …….In 3F2 there's a lot of muley doe. Not sure why ND doesn't just make a buck tag ANY deer, then a guy can opt for some meat last day if no shooter buck is taken. That's how SD does it
Move!In 3F2 there's a lot of muley doe. Not sure why ND doesn't just make a buck tag ANY deer, then a guy can opt for some meat last day if no shooter buck is taken. That's how SD does it
your correctThreads like this confirms moving back to Sodak in 02 was the right one
You’re*your correct
Interesting idea. Is Mule deer habitat really that great east of the Missouri River? I thought traditionally they were always found more readily west of the Mighty Mo. I know the eastern fringe of the coteau area seems Mule-y, but the RRV would be tough country for them.Something I’ve been contemplating is what if most of North Dakota was managed for mule deer and not whitetails. Mule deer seemed to have spread and thrived after ehd hit. They are less susceptible to ehd and to hard winters. It also seems they need less heavy cover habitat and do well in ag land and pasture land. Maybe we take a play from Montana and manage for mule deer in traditionally whitetail areas too, habitat loss is real and what we are doing isn’t working. Get rid of the any deer tags and issue whitetail only in those units. Whitetail habitat will not ever come back to what it was without serious federal funding or changes so let’s adapt and try something new instead of trying to save a sinking ship.
That does no good without the habitat to support the extra animals. It's not rocket science.Can quit issuing doe tags