OFFICIAL 2026 Deer Gun Lottery



Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
20,628
Likes
15,909
Points
983
In 3F2 there's a lot of muley doe. Not sure why ND doesn't just make a buck tag ANY deer, then a guy can opt for some meat last day if no shooter buck is taken. That's how SD does it
 


lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
24,347
Likes
8,805
Points
1,008
Location
Cavalier, ND
Nada for me again, looking forward to hunting minnesota for the first year this will be my 4th year in a row without a tag in one of the units with lots of habitat in the eastern part of the state.
 


Tymurrey

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Posts
519
Likes
306
Points
260
Something I’ve been contemplating is what if most of North Dakota was managed for mule deer and not whitetails. Mule deer seemed to have spread and thrived after ehd hit. They are less susceptible to ehd and to hard winters. It also seems they need less heavy cover habitat and do well in ag land and pasture land. Maybe we take a play from Montana and manage for mule deer in traditionally whitetail areas too, habitat loss is real and what we are doing isn’t working. Get rid of the any deer tags and issue whitetail only in those units. Whitetail habitat will not ever come back to what it was without serious federal funding or changes so let’s adapt and try something new instead of trying to save a sinking ship.
 

Duckslayer100

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
4,694
Likes
378
Points
358
Location
ND's Flatter Half
Something I’ve been contemplating is what if most of North Dakota was managed for mule deer and not whitetails. Mule deer seemed to have spread and thrived after ehd hit. They are less susceptible to ehd and to hard winters. It also seems they need less heavy cover habitat and do well in ag land and pasture land. Maybe we take a play from Montana and manage for mule deer in traditionally whitetail areas too, habitat loss is real and what we are doing isn’t working. Get rid of the any deer tags and issue whitetail only in those units. Whitetail habitat will not ever come back to what it was without serious federal funding or changes so let’s adapt and try something new instead of trying to save a sinking ship.
Interesting idea. Is Mule deer habitat really that great east of the Missouri River? I thought traditionally they were always found more readily west of the Mighty Mo. I know the eastern fringe of the coteau area seems Mule-y, but the RRV would be tough country for them.
 

wslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Posts
3,694
Likes
1,594
Points
578
And any additional habitat that is dotted across the landscape will be done by landowners, which will basically be off limits to Tom, Dick, and Harry anyways. If I ever win the lottery, I will contribute but otherwise it just isn't feasible.
 


Callem'In

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Posts
721
Likes
104
Points
235
Location
Eastern ND
Interesting idea. Is Mule deer habitat really that great east of the Missouri River? I thought traditionally they were always found more readily west of the Mighty Mo. I know the eastern fringe of the coteau area seems Mule-y, but the RRV would be tough country for them.
I know of small pockets of them in 2I and in 2B and they seem to be doing alright as far as maintaining numbers. I do not see many with big racks though, so might be a difference in nutrients.
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 293
  • This month: 99
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 51
  • This month: 36
  • This month: 33
  • This month: 33
  • This month: 29
  • This month: 29
  • This month: 28
Top Bottom