ND suppressor laws update?

[ndbwhunter]

I got an email back from one of my state representatives saying that there won’t be time during the special session to address this issue but plans on taking it up during the regular session in January. Probably for the best to give time for the dust to settle and see what other states are doing to work with this new ruling.
Oh, and have you been in contact with the legislators in your district on correcting these issues regarding suppressors, SBRs and SBSs? If not, why? If you have, what has been their response?

I have a bill draft ready to go and will be sending it out the my district 33 senator and representatives this evening. I'm just finishing up my email to them, and would be happy to share it with others that want to reach out to their district leaders to ask for their support.

 

[SDMF]

people buying right now arent using their brains. if they do legalize them, which its looking like they will, prices should drop SIGNIFICANTLY! You know they will build them in china for a fraction of the cost of those being made stateside.

Supply will be UGLY while current gun shops who aren’t class III bring in stock, and everyone with an FFL and 96 of their closest friends try to order “at cost”.

It’s not just people waiting to buy, it’s LARGE numbers of shops not currently selling.

 

[Kurtr]

ATF will no longer get enforce form 4

 

[labhunter66]

ATF will no longer get enforce fo

North Dakota law still needs to be changed because it requires compliance with the NFA. They specifically said their Open Letter does not affect state or local laws that govern NFA items. I've had conversations with some legislators and I'm quite sure it will be fixed in the upcoming session but I would be careful until that time.

 

[Kurtr]

North Dakota law still needs to be changed because it requires compliance with the NFA. They specifically said their Open Letter does not affect state or local laws that govern NFA items. I've had conversations with some legislators and I'm quite sure it will be fixed in the upcoming session but I would be careful until that time.

Good for me Sodak doesn’t have any restrictions.

 

[SDMF]

North Dakota law still needs to be changed because it requires compliance with the NFA. They specifically said their Open Letter does not affect state or local laws that govern NFA items. I've had conversations with some legislators and I'm quite sure it will be fixed in the upcoming session but I would be careful until that time.

I believe Armstrong directed Wrigley to join the state ATTY Gen’s that were in the TX suit. Likelyhood ND would pursue criminal charges for current NFA items is pretty doggone slim. I’d go so far as to say if you’re charged/convicted of anything concerning waived NFA Items due to the current state law, you probably EARNED that charge.

Grand scheme, the legislature now has an opportunity to make it extremely difficult for suppressors and SBR/S to ever be back onto some kind of “list” or worse, confiscated.

 

[johnr]

So I am needing to purchase a suppressor, what is my timeline of waiting to proceed?

I don't want to go through the current hoops, and such

 

[savage270]

So I am needing to purchase a suppressor, what is my timeline of waiting to proceed?

I don't want to go through the current hoops, and such

I just recently purchased one and it took less than a month from ordering to arriving. That seemed about half the time from the last time I got one.

 

[johnr]

I just recently purchased one and it took less than a month from ordering to arriving. That seemed about half the time from the last time I got one.

My question is more so, are there still all the needed BS for purchasing one, and how long do I need to wait for the BS to subside?

Like walk in and fill out a bit of paperwork, and walk out with it, or as close to that as one can get.

Not wanting all the trust, and lawyer nonsense.

 

[savage270]

I still had to jump through all the hoops, minus the $200 tax. I also did not do the trust.