He did go for the mid section the receiver came down and was bent over I don't know how much lower he could go and the hit was with his shoulder not his helmet. Go back and watch the videoshaziers intent was to make a tackle. did helmets contact? yeah they probably did but it was non-malscious contact that is part of football. when a player has time to make a football move they more often than not drop there head to absorb impact. the refs saw the same thing I did and deemed shaziers hit and any helmet contact to be incidental and not an act of maliscous intent, but a result of an offensive player making a move and a defenseive player making a tackle, making it more of a judgement call for the refs.
burficts hit was a completely obvious attempt to injure a player. he aimed his helmet at the helmet of another player who had not completed a football move. brown was still in the air for christs sake! it wasn't even debatable what his intent was going in high like that. if he was trying to make a clean hit he would have went at the mid-section of brown instead.
its hard to separate intent sometimes between a player just playing a rough injury prone game and a guy trying to take a cheap shot but when a player like burfict was out of control all game and causing a headache for the refs numerous times with his scuffles he was asking to be put in a microscope all game. then to make a play like that at the end how do you not think they wont call that? its not the refs fault, its not the stealers fault. most of the fault lies on the player but a lot lies on marvin lewis for not diffusing the situation earlier. he is the manager of the game and his men. there is a reason Burfict didn't get drafted in the 1st round. he had 1st round talent going into the draft but 31 other teams passed on him. wonder why?
yes
I wont argue lunker, shaziers hit wasn't completely clean either. but Bernard was two steps into making a football move. Brown wasn't. if they called helmet contact every time it happened they would have to call it every play. its football it happens. they are making it a point to protect defenseless players. could have they flagged shazier? absolutely but the fact they didn't was because it wasn't on a defenseless player and shazier plays the game intense but under control. the refs decided to let that play go as they do for a lot of hard hits that could go either way. my point is Burfict was acting like a thug and wasn't staying in the favor of the refs so it was an easy call on there part. on top of that it was on a defenseless player. I can't disagree with the way the refs called it. some hits are going to go un-punished if you play the game and don't get caught up in the extra garbage. if you at like a thug and play like a thug they are going to flag you every time.
- - - Updated - - -
blair walsh for president
:;:howdyDid you read my post Trip Mcnally, I am not denying your observation of the bengals bad plays but that play basically was the start to a downhill slide. The Steelers won that can't be denied but the officiating crew was not calling both sides fairly. The Steelers coach Joey Porter was not supposed to be on the field should of been two flags thrown which would offset.