FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts

Kurtr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
20,841
Likes
6,319
Points
1,008
Location
Mobridge,Sd
I don't believe any of this BS that "it's for the protection of children". Why you ask? Because if the welfare, protection, and safety of the children were the priority, the epstein files would be public knowledge and any and all crimes against children would be exposed and prosecuted. "Protect the children" is all to often empty lip service. If license plate reading was the only purpose for these cameras, then why are many of them pointed at playgrounds, parks, other places cars and trucks are rarely found? Inquiring minds want to know.
We got a war to fight for Israel right now they will get back to the Epstein files after if Bibi says its ok
 


KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
10,248
Likes
3,944
Points
863
Location
Valley City
We got a war to fight for Israel right now they will get back to the Epstein files after if Bibi says its ok
The whole israel thing is a rabbit hole that makes my azz itch. Distraction, misdirection, lies, and smoke are the most appealing aspects of that little disgustingness. But that is for a whole different thread.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,893
Likes
3,424
Points
908
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
Are those FLOCK cameras or Lowe’s own security cameras?

Have a look @ the ceiling in your favorite large store. The majority of them have dark plastic bubbles, many of which contain security cameras. Might not be all of them, could be some “decoy” bubbles.

It's possible, if not likely, they are Flock cameras paid for by the local business. Quite the business model. Reading up on Flock a while back they claimed Flock gets paid to install and maintain the camera, and then they also get to sell access to the imagery and the AI details to law enforcement, etc.
 


jdfisherman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Posts
304
Likes
315
Points
232
Are those FLOCK cameras or Lowe’s own security cameras?

Have a look @ the ceiling in your favorite large store. The majority of them have dark plastic bubbles, many of which contain security cameras. Might not be all of them, could be some “decoy” bubbles.
They show up on the deflock website.
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
21,473
Likes
16,824
Points
983
But if it saves one child it's worth violating our rights!
 

Obi-Wan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,699
Likes
8,752
Points
1,008
Location
Bismarck
Get that camera the flock away from me. Flock don't like it when the camera is on them.

"ain't no fun when the rabbit got the gun".

 


SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,748
Likes
1,851
Points
663
It's possible, if not likely, they are Flock cameras paid for by the local business. Quite the business model. Reading up on Flock a while back they claimed Flock gets paid to install and maintain the camera, and then they also get to sell access to the imagery and the AI details to law enforcement, etc.
They show up on the deflock website.
I guess that answers that. I’ve done virtually 0 research on the subject.

Security vs. Privacy has always been and will always be a delicate balancing act.
 

Colt45

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
1,250
Likes
690
Points
333
See guys, it’s no problem. All you have to do when you get falsely identified and keep getting pulled over by every cop you pass is go to court and prove your innocence. Easy peasy.
 

KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
10,248
Likes
3,944
Points
863
Location
Valley City
See guys, it’s no problem. All you have to do when you get falsely identified and keep getting pulled over by every cop you pass is go to court and prove your innocence. Easy peasy.
This is completely WRONG!! Guilt needs to be proven. Innocence is the default and need not be proven. If innocence needs to be proven, we are all guilty, regardless of truth, and closer to the bad things people are already whispering about civil conflicts.
 

Colt45

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Posts
1,250
Likes
690
Points
333
This is completely WRONG!! Guilt needs to be proven. Innocence is the default and need not be proven. If innocence needs to be proven, we are all guilty, regardless of truth, and closer to the bad things people are already whispering about civil conflicts.
Settle down KDM, it was sarcasm, but that is the road we are going down with state survellience, you are guilty cause the camera caught you........ or at least it looked like you
 

KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
10,248
Likes
3,944
Points
863
Location
Valley City
Settle down KDM, it was sarcasm, but that is the road we are going down with state survellience, you are guilty cause the camera caught you........ or at least it looked like you
I understood as much and my response was not directed at you personally or at you in any way. The highlighted portion is the crux of this issue that is probably the most dangerous development in today's society IMO. If the population as a whole begins to feel that they are guilty of whatever this surveillance system says they are guilty of, it creates a sense of hopelessness that drifts historically toward a response that starts small and grows into something I sincerely pray does not develop. Suffice it to say that me reaching a point of "Settle Down" with respect to the highlighted statement is probably not going to happen. No disrespect, hostility, or even mild annoyance directed to you Colt45.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 66
  • This month: 46
  • This month: 32
  • This month: 26
  • This month: 24
  • This month: 22
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 13
Top Bottom