Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land

Weaver

New member
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Posts
13
Likes
2
Points
3
The law allowing hunters to trespass onto posted property to retrieve game shot elsewhere. Again I am all for recovery of “legally taken animals” but this has opened up a huge can of worms for the landowners. Exploitation of it has created all kinds of trouble for landowners wanting to keep private land private. Use the model other states have requiring permission to track/ recover because it should be up to the private landowner as to who he wants on his land, not the government. It truly is unconstitutional to seize private land for special interest pursuits again regardless of the brevity of each situation. It has been abused to excess and the wording or law should be repealed/ changed to revert full ownership to the landowner as it is in nearly every state. What makes ND different from the rest who respect landowner rights?
 


Iwhackwheat

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Posts
92
Likes
191
Points
165
No land is being seized. If they are already breaking the law shooting the animal, a new law that says they can’t retrieve it isn’t going to stop them. That law is going to impede legal hunters who sometimes have an unfortunate circumstance.
 

Weaver

New member
Joined
Nov 15, 2024
Posts
13
Likes
2
Points
3
No land is being seized. If they are already breaking the law shooting the animal, a new law that says they can’t retrieve it isn’t going to stop them. That law is going to impede legal hunters who sometimes have an unfortunate circumstance.
I am referring to those who use the existing law to exploit the meaning of it. using it to aid them in carrying out an illegal act. Other states respect Private property rights why not ND? And yes land is being seized for that moment.
 

Eatsleeptrap

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
901
Likes
3,123
Points
638
Location
Rose Hill Township
Forty North Dakota deer seasons and I have never heard of people driving deer off of posted land by pretending to need to recover a wounded animal. NEVER. Anyone else heard of this?
 

bravo

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
698
Likes
561
Points
270
This is an attempt to light a fire for the upcoming legislative session. Another manufactured outrage for a new useless law in under the landowner rights banner.
 


PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,580
Likes
1,156
Points
543
Location
Drifting the high plains
Unfortunately I have seen it all on both sides. One day south of Pipestem dam headquarters a van with Minnesota plates was parked on the road between a no hunting zone and private posted land. I thought maybe they missed the signs so I stopped simply to inform him that his five friends headed our way were in a no hunting zone. He said they were just photographing. Sure enough they all had cameras, but they were marching abreast 50 yards apart. I asked him if he thought game wardens were retarded enough to believe it.
On the other hand I have witnessed (not hunting with me) a person told he can't retrieve on private land when the deer was dead and visible from the road. The landowner told the hunter it was a Game and Fish regulation and that under trespass law he had called the Sheriff and had people prosecuted before. I listened for a couple minutes put the pickup in gear and drove away from that crap show.
My hunting partner one year scouted for a couple weeks ahead of time. He pulled into an approach opening day and watched from sunrise to about 11:58 am when the landowner pulled up and drove a post with a posted sign only inches from his front bumper smiling all the while

No one group has a monopoly on aholes. Unfortunately one bad hunter ticks of multiple landowners, and one bad landowner ticks off many hunters. And off we march more divided and both with less support each year.
 
Last edited:

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 363
  • This month: 322
  • This month: 109
  • This month: 91
  • This month: 75
  • This month: 72
  • This month: 65
  • This month: 59
  • This month: 54
  • This month: 50
Top Bottom