Illegal Guide Prosecuted

deleted user

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
1,097
Likes
1,166
Points
408
https://gf.nd.gov/enforcement/news/the-shady-outfitter

The Shady Outfitter​

District Game Warden Erik Schmidt
A Maryland man has pled guilty to numerous state game and fish charges related to providing illegal hunting outfitter services and residency fraud in Logan County, North Dakota.
The suspect, a resident of Federalsburg, MD, recently pled guilty to nine counts of providing outfitting services without a license, one count of advertising outfitting services without being licensed and one count of misrepresentation in application for license in Logan County.
In October 2023, North Dakota Game Warden Erik Schmidt checked the suspect who was a part of a group of waterfowl hunters in Logan County.
Although all of the vehicles used by the hunters in the group had out-of-state licenses, the suspect provided warden Schmidt with a North Dakota resident hunting license.
An investigation into the suspect's residency showed he was living in Federalsburg, MD and had purchased multiple 2023 Maryland resident hunting and fishing licenses two days before purchasing his 2023 North Dakota resident hunting and fishing licenses.
Shortly after beginning the investigation into the suspect for residency fraud, investigators learned he was a licensed hunting outfitter in Maryland and owned a hunting guide and outfitter business in Maryland.

Evidence suggested he was operating an unlicensed waterfowl hunting guide and outfitter business in North Dakota out of a house he owned in Napoleon, ND as well.
Further investigation showed that starting in 2022, he began offering North Dakota guided and outfitted waterfowl hunts as an unlicensed outfitter in North Dakota.
As an unlicensed North Dakota outfitter, he advertised and sold multiple North Dakota waterfowl hunts to clients of his Maryland business and on online hunting auction sites in 2022 and 2023.
He had already sold and booked North Dakota waterfowl hunts in 2024 prior to being charged.
In September 2024, he was charged with 11 counts of providing outfitting services without a license, one count of advertising guiding or outfitting services without being licensed and one count of misrepresentation in application for license in Logan County.
Through his attorney he pled guilty to 11 of the original 13 counts.
He was assessed a fine of $1,000 and had his hunting privileges suspended in North Dakota for a period of three years.
Because North Dakota and Maryland are both members of the Interstate Wildlife violators compact, his privileges to hunt may be suspended in Maryland as well as all other member states.
The Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation assisted in this case.


Can’t thank the state court system enough for charging this man a total of $1000 for his 11 counts over 3 years. He was probably tipped that every day in the field. Him and his friends will be back.
 


Petras

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
1,733
Likes
426
Points
338
Location
Stanley
So let me get this straight.... he plead guilty to 11 counts of outfitting without a license and was probably paid $500+ for each hunt.... so he made a minimum of $5500 off those hunts ( likely a lot more because I feel like I'm guessing low on the cost of a guided waterfowl hunt) and only paid a $1000 fine? This makes absolutely ZERO sense... The fine should have at least covered all the revenue from the hunts.... And then double it for fucks sake... And a 3 year hunting ban? Wow guys, don't punish him too hard.... Heaven forbid we use the penalties in situations like this as a deterrant for future fuckheads....
 

deleted user

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
1,097
Likes
1,166
Points
408
So let me get this straight.... he plead guilty to 11 counts of outfitting without a license and was probably paid $500+ for each hunt.... so he made a minimum of $5500 off those hunts ( likely a lot more because I feel like I'm guessing low on the cost of a guided waterfowl hunt) and only paid a $1000 fine? This makes absolutely ZERO sense... The fine should have at least covered all the revenue from the hunts.... And then double it for fucks sake... And a 3 year hunting ban? Wow guys, don't punish him too hard.... Heaven forbid we use the penalties in situations like this as a deterrant for future fuckheads....
Yep. Why would a warden even put in the time investigating and building a case if they know the guy will pay his little fine out of pocket and be back in a couple years? I’d like to dig into it and see who the judge was or why the prosecutor went so easy on him.
 


1lessdog

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2019
Posts
2,023
Likes
1,312
Points
493
It's only 1500.00 for a non-resident outfitters lic. I don't know why he wouldn't go that route .

I agree 1000.00 is nothing. If you want people to stop doing this stuff, you need to sting them good and hard.
 

ndlongshot

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Posts
1,839
Likes
211
Points
293
Is the 3 years of lost income possibly fit into this? Does he lose his guiding license in MD? I'm sure he can find work arounds to still run his business.
 


Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
17,584
Likes
12,980
Points
983
Add a zero and a crooked number in front.
 

zoops

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Posts
1,946
Likes
327
Points
333
Gross. Gotta imagine there's plenty of tax evasion going on in a case like that too. I have to believe there's plenty of this sort of thing going on around the state.
 

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,464
Likes
1,462
Points
588
I agree 1000.00 is nothing. If you want people to stop doing this stuff, you need to sting them good and hard.
Agreed, violations need to hurt. $1K fine means he got a $3500 discount just on the NR guiding license portion for the 3 yrs he operated here illegally the 3 yrs they know about). Plus whatever he saved buying the resident hunting license as well as all the extra time he was allowed to hunt by not being curtailed to 2 5-day periods. The part I find particularly irritating is they oughta know such a small fine is basically only going to encourage the person to keep right on doing what he was doing by using someone else's name. I realized it's been a while ~15yrs, maybe a few more and it's a different county but Streeter is only ~30Mi from Napoleon. How many times was the same guy busted there for outfitting guiding without a license by putting the business in someone else's name?

A quick glance looks like going rate for a ND waterfowl hunt is ~$1500-$3K per person for a 3 day hunt. $500-$1K/day/hunter.

$1K fine. Uff-Da!!!

I guess it follows roughly the same outline as the small up-front fee paid for ANS with no real plan for the $$ beyond a couple bill-boards and enforcement that's so infrequent there needs to be a word far less imposing that "enforcement" as it pertains to ANS, or double-dipping on good fishing days, going over daily and possession limits, trespass, etc, etc, etc.
 

shorthairman

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Posts
737
Likes
80
Points
175
Location
North Central Nebraska
Petras beat me to it...as I got to the end my thoughts were "Only a $1000.00 fine...the guy laughed that off because he made ten times that, if not more, in what he charged for hunts..." Not from ND and I am sure it would have been the same here in NE, but as mentioned people like this need to be taught a lesson to be sure they will never commit the same crime again. He'll be right back at it in 3 years. SMH...
 

luvcatchingbass

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Posts
4,241
Likes
1,141
Points
523
Location
SE ND.
The loss of hunting rights on some people makes me scratch my head sometimes. If you premeditate and intend to break certain laws such as this guy, poacher, keeping aggreges over limit of birds or fish then do you really think that not being allowed to have a license for a year or two will actually keep them from hunting or fishing?
 


Retired-Guy

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Posts
1,129
Likes
251
Points
298
Location
Bismarck
Anyone know how to find out the identity of the judge? We could swamp him with emails. Just wouldn't want to get too nasty so as to invite a libel suit.
 

Davy Crockett

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
15,360
Likes
2,621
Points
783
Location
Boondocks
Anyone know how to find out the identity of the judge? We could swamp him with emails. Just wouldn't want to get too nasty so as to invite a libel suit.
The article doesn't even list the guilty parties name, without that there isn't much to go on.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 95
  • This month: 35
  • This month: 31
  • This month: 28
  • This month: 21
  • This month: 18
  • This month: 17
  • This month: 17
  • This month: 16
  • This month: 15
Top Bottom