kiss it bye bye

[PrairieGhost]

should the govt own huge tracts of land in the US? Im kinda thinking not, from a principled, small govt perspective.

Someone needs to tell the gov it's not their land, it's ours. The rich will buy off the land to pay off the stupidity of liberal spending. Kiss hunting goodbye then second amendment will follow.

I'm afraid this will loose many votes for those we had hopes for. It looks like we could loose freedom either way.

 

[Rowdie]

should the govt own huge tracts of land in the US? Im kinda thinking not, from a principled, small govt perspective.

Since the government is supposed to be WE THE PEOPLE I'm not against US owning land.

 

[Rowdie]

 

[PrairieGhost]

The sporting industry knows they make more profit selling to a million peons than a few multimillionaires that can afford hunting in five years.

 

[Allen]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=78f7779f4ac84a10e8f6dd3757720377&ei=38

Sounds like the Senate rules have been broken when it comes to "reconciliation". Which means they will have to take out the part of the Big Beautiful Bill which calls for the sale of public lands out west.

For those following along at home, this should effectively thwart the loss of those lands. Under Reconciliation, they only need a straight up majority in the Senate. This will force anything attempting to sell the land to go by more normal Senate rules, which would require 60 votes. No way are the Republicans going to get 10 Democrats to go along with this, IMHO.

 

[bravo]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=78f7779f4ac84a10e8f6dd3757720377&ei=38

Sounds like the Senate rules have been broken when it comes to "reconciliation". Which means they will have to take out the part of the Big Beautiful Bill which calls for the sale of public lands out west.

For those following along at home, this should effectively thwart the loss of those lands. Under Reconciliation, they only need a straight up majority in the Senate. This will force anything attempting to sell the land to go by more normal Senate rules, which would require 60 votes. No way are the Republicans going to get 10 Democrats to go along with this, IMHO.

Senator Mike Lee (R), Utah is re-writing it as we speak to make sure it gets back in there. Don’t let up.

 

[powerman]

Sent a message to our senators opposing this and was not impressed with kramers response. It didn't even mention sales of public land.

 

[Fester]

Sent a message to our senators opposing this and was not impressed with kramers response. It didn't even mention sales of public land.

Lol..i swear i warned people...try and set up a time to discuss this. Good luck!

 

[Rowdie]

 

[Allen]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=4b90a8a4325444ada9627b88aef17276&ei=129

Jackwad Lee has pulled the selling of lands portion due to pushback from both sides of the aisle.

 

[Rowdie]

Another local story on it