Montana Train Derailment

FightingSioux

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Posts
703
Likes
353
Points
215
Location
ND
A tank of sodium hydrosulfide was in danger of falling in. Sounds like they got it emptied before it became an issue. Only saw that on one news source.
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
968
Likes
869
Points
293
Location
Space
A locomotive weighs..let's say 200 tons or more each. More than likely there was more than one. Didn't collapse with those suckers going over it. My money still on derailment then hit the bridge with the impact of the cars shifting the upright...could be wrong though. To me if it was going to shift and collapse the locomotives would have cause that. I believe the cars are around 120 tons or around there so substantialy lighter then the locomotives.
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
968
Likes
869
Points
293
Location
Space
Yes, more regulations would prevent these! LOL.
It probably would have…just like the east Palestine derailment or the Boeing crashes that killed a good number of people..I am not for regulating a company that can regulate themselves….sometimes they can’t self regulate.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,515
Likes
1,539
Points
638
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
It’s been flooding pretty bad the last month too. Piers don’t bend over like that for no reason
Flooding out along the upper Yellowstone? Ehh, not so much:

1712930713606.png


The above peak equals roughly 2,000 CFS at the peak, which is WELL below flooding. Because, like us, they have been much warmer than normal this winter, the water levels are slightly above normal for this period, but that's only because they are losing their snow early. They won't likely get into flood category this spring without significant rains over the coming weeks.
 

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,942
Likes
663
Points
448
Flooding out along the upper Yellowstone? Ehh, not so much:

1712930713606.png


The above peak equals roughly 2,000 CFS at the peak, which is WELL below flooding. Because, like us, they have been much warmer than normal this winter, the water levels are slightly above normal for this period, but that's only because they are losing their snow early. They won't likely get into flood category this spring without significant rains over the coming weeks.
The OP is from last year. '24 data doesn't matter.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 190
  • This month: 153
  • This month: 142
  • This month: 137
  • This month: 113
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 88
  • This month: 84
  • This month: 78
Top Bottom