ND Constitutional measure

North Dakota voters will decide Constitutional Measure No. 1 in the June 9, 2026 primary election. T

  • YES

    Votes: 10 30.3%
  • NO

    Votes: 23 69.7%

  • Total voters
    33

Slappy

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Posts
962
Likes
870
Points
333
Location
Bismarck
I had gave him a check to pay for lunch. I would pay 2 or 3 month a head. He forgot to take the check to the office.

This exemplifies one of the many reasons I'm opposed to taxpayer provided lunches. The lunch counter life lessons for me in elementary school were responsibility and understanding the cost of living. I learned the importance of depositing that check on time, and I saw how much a simple meal cost my parents to provide for me.
 


Duckslayer100

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
4,675
Likes
348
Points
358
Location
ND's Flatter Half
#2 You would think because the program is out there everyone would apply and it would be easy. They don't and many families that do not meet threshold do not pay. School then have to attempt to collect a debt and to be honest many of those debts are not collectable. So now that money is not recouped and the only one hurt is the kid. Free school lunch takes care of this and these is a good possibility it would be cheaper.

North Dakota law prohibits schools from both denying lunch to kids, as well as asking for money if their account goes in the negative. A few years ago, the FPS district was something like $50,000 in the hole from school lunch defecit, and an anonymous donor paid for it.

Tell me how that makes sense whatsoever? Most of us pay for our kids' lunches, but if we just decided to say hell with it and stop, they can run hundreds or thousands of dollars in the hole, still get a hot lunch every day, and the school can't say a peep to get compensated.
 

JUSTWINGNIT

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 29, 2015
Posts
401
Likes
24
Points
178
North Dakota law prohibits schools from both denying lunch to kids, as well as asking for money if their account goes in the negative. A few years ago, the FPS district was something like $50,000 in the hole from school lunch defecit, and an anonymous donor paid for it.

Tell me how that makes sense whatsoever? Most of us pay for our kids' lunches, but if we just decided to say hell with it and stop, they can run hundreds or thousands of dollars in the hole, still get a hot lunch every day, and the school can't say a peep to get compensated.
Out here in Washburn, the school sends e-mails to notify you if you get low or go negative. I don't recall if they actually ask for money or not.
 

Duckslayer100

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Posts
4,675
Likes
348
Points
358
Location
ND's Flatter Half
Out here in Washburn, the school sends e-mails to notify you if you get low or go negative. I don't recall if they actually ask for money or not.
Ok I was partially correct, they CAN ask for money, but can't send you collections or force you to pay:

Key Aspects of North Dakota Law & Proposed Legislation (2023-2026):
  • "Lunch Shaming" Prohibition (HB 1494): Schools cannot identify students with unpaid balances, require them to work for meals, or deny them a reimbursable, nutritious meal.
  • Unpaid Debt Policy: While schools cannot withhold food, they are permitted to seek payment from parents/guardians, though policies prevent sending such debts to collections
 

NDbowman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Posts
1,243
Likes
513
Points
313
When I was in elementary school in the late 80s and early 90s, I remember kids whose parents didn't pay their lunch or milk tickets and probably qualified for reduced/free lunches but he parents didn't get it taken care of. The teacher would read off the list of names and tell the kids to get their parents to take care of it, I was embarassed for them.
One thing though, no matter how late or unpaid their lunch tickets were, no kid was ever refused lunch at school.
 


johnr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
21,873
Likes
8,310
Points
948
Location
Dickinson
I can recall a time 28 or so years ago, going to the market with my then 3 year old daughter, we used one of those kid carts to put the groceries in, make it a fun little experience for our little kid. When we had gathered what we were needing for the week, and after it was all rang up, turns out we did not have enough on the account for it to process. Young and credit cardless we had to leave the groceries and do the walk of shame with our little one asking why we were not gathering up our bags of food.

Guess what never happened in my life again?

Not saying ever a kid should be shamed for their lack luster parents suckiness, but sometimes a little shame, which this day and age seems the current generation does not have, can go a long ways.

Sounds like the kid gets feed either way, so they should not be getting looked upon. If somehow we could get the dead beat parent to have to do some janitor work, or lunch lady duties to cover their debts.
 

NDSportsman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Posts
3,856
Likes
1,523
Points
553
Location
East Central ND
Amazing how parents can afford the latest and greatest I-phone for themselves and their kids but can't afford to feed them!
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 134
  • This month: 37
  • This month: 27
  • This month: 27
  • This month: 25
  • This month: 23
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 19
  • This month: 18
Top Bottom