NFL News (Vikings)



lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
24,685
Likes
9,165
Points
1,008
Location
Cavalier, ND
This years superbowl was a basically a carbon copy of the 2015 season where a team at the bottom of the strength of schedule made it to the super bowl, and the team that won a superbowl relied heavily on their defense to win that game.
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
3,026
Likes
2,611
Points
628
Location
Space
I hated the Kirk Cousin deal so I get it. You keep hating on Darnold. I'm sure he will feel a disturbance in the force because of it. Maybe while he is out having a parade and getting fitted for a super bowl ring it will bring a tear to his eye?
Nope..posted befire i watch nfl but really dont have a team. Dont hate him or kirk..just dont think they are good. Bench warmers also get a ring....
 


Walleye Slayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Posts
71
Likes
102
Points
177
Location
Pierre, SD
No I was answering the member who said something about “Pukers” worse than Queens. Those numbers would be 13 Packers championships to 1 for the Vikes, and 4 Packers Super Bowls to 0 for the Vikes. It’s always funny when a Vikes fan says quit living in past glory and then wants to call the Pack a worse franchise because of Super Bowl era regular season records.
Kind of hard to compare the championships when the Vikings didn't exist until 1961 and the packers started in 1919. So lets do championships from 61 to 69 I will acknowledge that the packers under Lombardi were pretty dominant. The Packers win those years 5-1. In the super bowl era the Vikings are 0-4 and the Packers are 4-1 which means in the Superbowl era the Packers have been in the Superbowl only ONE more time than the Vikings. Over the that span the Vikings have won more games in total than the Packers. Vikings hold the edge 517-498. Although I will concede that the packers hold the Head to Head 67-61-3 over the span in the Superbowl era. Since 1961 we are basically the same team as the Packers with the only real difference being winning or not winning the Superbowl. we have both won the division 21 times, we are both 3-6 in the NFC championship games. So again I say if the Vikings are mediocre you must concede that other than winning the Superbowl the Packers have been mediocre also over the span of the Superbowl area.
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
3,026
Likes
2,611
Points
628
Location
Space




lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
24,685
Likes
9,165
Points
1,008
Location
Cavalier, ND
Perhaps its not him? One hopes it was and we find a better GM, i still think a retired player would be a much better option.
 

lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
24,685
Likes
9,165
Points
1,008
Location
Cavalier, ND
Never he is a movie star, we someone thats a GM who is better at picking defensive players. Vikes have been terrible at picking decent defensive players especially under McConnell
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 322
  • This month: 235
  • This month: 183
  • This month: 83
  • This month: 58
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 40
  • This month: 37
  • This month: 35
  • This month: 32
Top Bottom