NFL News (Vikings)

Eatsleeptrap

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
2,031
Likes
6,220
Points
858
He cant..he had 1 touchdown..same as maye..everyone else scored..field goals...field goals..defensive touchdown..etc.
I hated the Kirk Cousin deal so I get it. You keep hating on Darnold. I'm sure he will feel a disturbance in the force because of it. Maybe while he is out having a parade and getting fitted for a super bowl ring it will bring a tear to his eye?
 


lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
23,794
Likes
8,259
Points
1,008
Location
Cavalier, ND
This years superbowl was a basically a carbon copy of the 2015 season where a team at the bottom of the strength of schedule made it to the super bowl, and the team that won a superbowl relied heavily on their defense to win that game.
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
3,021
Likes
2,601
Points
628
Location
Space
I hated the Kirk Cousin deal so I get it. You keep hating on Darnold. I'm sure he will feel a disturbance in the force because of it. Maybe while he is out having a parade and getting fitted for a super bowl ring it will bring a tear to his eye?
Nope..posted befire i watch nfl but really dont have a team. Dont hate him or kirk..just dont think they are good. Bench warmers also get a ring....
 


Walleye Slayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Posts
59
Likes
83
Points
162
Location
Pierre, SD
No I was answering the member who said something about “Pukers” worse than Queens. Those numbers would be 13 Packers championships to 1 for the Vikes, and 4 Packers Super Bowls to 0 for the Vikes. It’s always funny when a Vikes fan says quit living in past glory and then wants to call the Pack a worse franchise because of Super Bowl era regular season records.
Kind of hard to compare the championships when the Vikings didn't exist until 1961 and the packers started in 1919. So lets do championships from 61 to 69 I will acknowledge that the packers under Lombardi were pretty dominant. The Packers win those years 5-1. In the super bowl era the Vikings are 0-4 and the Packers are 4-1 which means in the Superbowl era the Packers have been in the Superbowl only ONE more time than the Vikings. Over the that span the Vikings have won more games in total than the Packers. Vikings hold the edge 517-498. Although I will concede that the packers hold the Head to Head 67-61-3 over the span in the Superbowl era. Since 1961 we are basically the same team as the Packers with the only real difference being winning or not winning the Superbowl. we have both won the division 21 times, we are both 3-6 in the NFC championship games. So again I say if the Vikings are mediocre you must concede that other than winning the Superbowl the Packers have been mediocre also over the span of the Superbowl area.
 

Rut2much

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
2,969
Likes
896
Points
438
Location
Devils lake
Sam Darnold (19/38, 202 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT) he killed it out there today
sam darnold (W, Lombardi, ring)
Vikings (worn out seat cushions, pissed off fan base)

Should think of changing their name to the Minnesota Tannerites because they sure know how to blow it.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 198
  • This month: 82
  • This month: 70
  • This month: 57
  • This month: 52
  • This month: 50
  • This month: 42
  • This month: 40
  • This month: 39
  • This month: 34
Top Bottom