I hated the Kirk Cousin deal so I get it. You keep hating on Darnold. I'm sure he will feel a disturbance in the force because of it. Maybe while he is out having a parade and getting fitted for a super bowl ring it will bring a tear to his eye?
Get over it.
Nope..posted befire i watch nfl but really dont have a team. Dont hate him or kirk..just dont think they are good. Bench warmers also get a ring....
Kind of hard to compare the championships when the Vikings didn't exist until 1961 and the packers started in 1919. So lets do championships from 61 to 69 I will acknowledge that the packers under Lombardi were pretty dominant. The Packers win those years 5-1. In the super bowl era the Vikings are 0-4 and the Packers are 4-1 which means in the Superbowl era the Packers have been in the Superbowl only ONE more time than the Vikings. Over the that span the Vikings have won more games in total than the Packers. Vikings hold the edge 517-498. Although I will concede that the packers hold the Head to Head 67-61-3 over the span in the Superbowl era. Since 1961 we are basically the same team as the Packers with the only real difference being winning or not winning the Superbowl. we have both won the division 21 times, we are both 3-6 in the NFC championship games. So again I say if the Vikings are mediocre you must concede that other than winning the Superbowl the Packers have been mediocre also over the span of the Superbowl area.
sam darnold (W, Lombardi, ring)
