What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleted member" data-source="post: 357194" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. </p><p></p><p>take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. </p><p></p><p>one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit.</p><p></p><p>don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. </p><p></p><p>just my 2 cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleted member, post: 357194, member: 816"] gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit. don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. just my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
What are these things?
Latest: NDSportsman
24 minutes ago
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: NDSportsman
29 minutes ago
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
40 minutes ago
N
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: NodakBob
51 minutes ago
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: tdismydog
Today at 2:37 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Today at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Today at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 2:37 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
Top
Bottom