What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleted member" data-source="post: 357194" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. </p><p></p><p>take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. </p><p></p><p>one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit.</p><p></p><p>don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. </p><p></p><p>just my 2 cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleted member, post: 357194, member: 816"] gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit. don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. just my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Spring Turkey 2025
Latest: Freedom
Today at 9:27 PM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Freedom
Today at 9:18 PM
Let's See a BaseBall Game
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 5:49 PM
Destination Fishing Trip??
Latest: johnr
Today at 4:06 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 3:38 PM
Jerkbaits In a Pool
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 12:38 PM
You’re never a nobody.
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 11:43 AM
Memes
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 6:31 AM
Ready or not, here it comes.
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 6:28 AM
Spring Snows
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:32 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 4:46 PM
W
Open water?
Latest: Wall-eyes
Yesterday at 2:19 PM
R
The Birds.........
Latest: Retired Educator
Yesterday at 1:52 PM
L
Handgun Choices
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 1:49 PM
1
Oahe, Smelt, thoughts?
Latest: 1850reata
Yesterday at 9:44 AM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Wednesday at 7:15 PM
March 29
Latest: Kurtr
Wednesday at 2:25 PM
Possible ban ffs sota
Latest: Captainbrad
Wednesday at 7:35 AM
Same Dean Nelson?
Latest: Davey Crockett
Wednesday at 6:12 AM
M
Getting into Canada
Latest: measure-it
Tuesday at 6:19 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
Top
Bottom