What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleted member" data-source="post: 357194" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. </p><p></p><p>take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. </p><p></p><p>one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit.</p><p></p><p>don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. </p><p></p><p>just my 2 cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleted member, post: 357194, member: 816"] gonna start with one simple example cause i am short on time. but, imagine if you will, you live in steele county for example. population 1800. can't imagine there is enough economic activity in finley, sharon and hope to fund the counties bills via sales tax alone. so, how would one propose paying for their roads, schools, general infrastructure, etc... without property taxes? make the state fund it with $ generated from someone else's pocket is really the only other way to do it? and that's sorta what allen is getting at. the people who own the land that benefit from the infrastructure and services should have to pay for said infrastructure and services. take it a step further, lets pretend some out of state billionaire comes in and starts buying up farmland. at an average of $1000/acre (that includes tillable, non-tillable, etc...) for example, he could buy the whole county for half of a billion dollars. how much money in alternative taxes do non-resident landowners generate? practically $0.00. again, how's a fella supposed to pay the bills in that county without property taxes. one of the biggest bitches i had last time around about property taxes was the idea that you never "really own your property" if you are always beholden to the guberment for a tax every year. and that is true. but, there needs to be some mechanism for two things: 1. funding the services that benefit my property. and 2. making sure the government has a mechanism for taking possession of absentee landowner's property who don't pay for said services and/or let their property go to shit. don't get me wrong, i think we need some sort of overhaul. government is drunk on the tit. but, that's more of a spending problem than it is a property tax system problem imho. and, after nearly a decade? now of thinking about it. i am not sure there is a proposed alternative that is better. just my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Maddog
3 minutes ago
Weekend project
Latest: Maddog
17 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Maddog
19 minutes ago
H
RR
Red River 9-16-26
Latest: hankowl89
Today at 5:45 PM
2013 Ice Castle 8x20
Latest: WormWiggler
Today at 4:15 PM
Free
Scheels Recluse bow to young h
Latest: 5575
Today at 4:10 PM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 3:24 PM
T
Morning Doves
Latest: Traxion
Today at 3:21 PM
H
RR
Red River 9-10-26
Latest: hazelpipe
Today at 1:47 PM
Cocks
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 1:12 PM
C
RR
Red River 9-2-26
Latest: creekridge
Today at 10:01 AM
A
A dependable high MPG used car
Latest: Auggie
Today at 8:47 AM
EHD is back..AGAIN!
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 11:04 PM
Pronghorn
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 8:57 PM
T
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 8:34 PM
W
Sak
Van Hook 8-26-27-2026
Latest: wales
Yesterday at 10:20 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: jr2280
Yesterday at 12:15 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 11:46 PM
O
Doorbell Cameras
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Friday at 8:46 PM
Warm Feet~
Latest: Maddog
Friday at 10:55 AM
New Record P&Y and B&C Elk
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 9:14 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property taxes
Top
Bottom