Catfishermen4201
Member
And the other confusing thing is that in New York City there are cameras everywhere and he would have know, especially at the front desk at check in...yet he really wasn't all that concerned...that one confuses me.
Actually, only about 1% of the vaccine adverse reaction reports are filed so in reality it's about 99 times more than what is even reported. Which means instead of the 58,000 deaths reported is would be more like 5,800,000 died from the so-called vaccines. Sounds like you may be biased about your post. Is it possible that you took the so-called jabs too and don't want to believe the data that has come out since the gene therapy shots began? Sure hope you didn't take them because I just lost a family member due to the jabs. Seems you are the one promoting false/misleading information!Wally- as usual, you’re promoting false/misleading information. Info taken directly from VAERS website.
Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness
The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.
I thought at the beginning that no one is this stupid and most of the evidence he left may have been intended to deceive. For example everyone thinks his gun was jamming. Was this on purpose so that he could catch his spent cases? People will say can't you read they found the cases with deny, defend, depose engraved on them. They found cases, but if he was intelligent instead of stupid he would have picked up like cases (not random) at a gun range, engraved them, altered the gun to catch his brass, and dumped the decoy brass at the scene. Or he maybe left his cases and now polished the handgun bore, chamber, and bolt face, and switched out his fireing pin. Also if he had an accomplice they could have used his identification and credit card, and stayed in a motel 1000 miles away that night. I wonder how much face altering makeup he had on in that picture. If I had to pick intelligent or stupid I would have to flip a coin.I honestly would be surprised if he is a United States citizen...who knows. The guy for sure knew what he was doing and I wouldn't be surprised if the things he left were on purpose...
Plus, if they are correct on that handgun...that sucker costs $5700...not your average Joe buys one of those.
Agree this guy is long gone..law will probably try and pin it on an innocent guy so they don't get heat.Id say it was professional hit. The picture they have of the guy at the hostel is not the same guy. Different jacket and backpack. The shooter is gone. Out of the country.
Just seen that....Apparently they’re holding a dude in PA under suspicion
My thoughts too…. Loose ends could have been intentional.I thought at the beginning that no one is this stupid and most of the evidence he left may have been intended to deceive. For example everyone thinks his gun was jamming. Was this on purpose so that he could catch his spent cases? People will say can't you read they found the cases with deny, defend, depose engraved on them. They found cases, but if he was intelligent instead of stupid he would have picked up like cases (not random) at a gun range, engraved them, altered the gun to catch his brass, and dumped the decoy brass at the scene. Or he maybe left his cases and now polished the handgun bore, chamber, and bolt face, and switched out his fireing pin. Also if he had an accomplice they could have used his identification and credit card, and stayed in a motel 1000 miles away that night. I wonder how much face altering makeup he had on in that picture. If I had to pick intelligent or stupid I would have to flip a coin.