United Healthcare CEO Shot

Joined
Jul 21, 2024
Posts
27
Likes
28
Points
13
Location
South Central North Dakota
And the other confusing thing is that in New York City there are cameras everywhere and he would have know, especially at the front desk at check in...yet he really wasn't all that concerned...that one confuses me.
 


Joined
Jul 21, 2024
Posts
27
Likes
28
Points
13
Location
South Central North Dakota
And....think about this for a second...no words from Trump regarding this, not 1 single tweet or post. Isn't Trump about getting rid of the ObamaCare mandate? Yet Trump was all about the George Flyod sitch immediately!?! Hmmm, just saying. Is his purge just beginning? WWII type weapon used, seems very odd.
 

Narcs

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 3, 2015
Posts
117
Likes
74
Points
145
Location
Bismarck
Wally- as usual, you’re promoting false/misleading information. Info taken directly from VAERS website.

Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.

Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.
 


Wally World

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Jun 29, 2023
Posts
720
Likes
994
Points
240
Wally- as usual, you’re promoting false/misleading information. Info taken directly from VAERS website.

Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.

Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.
Actually, only about 1% of the vaccine adverse reaction reports are filed so in reality it's about 99 times more than what is even reported. Which means instead of the 58,000 deaths reported is would be more like 5,800,000 died from the so-called vaccines. Sounds like you may be biased about your post. Is it possible that you took the so-called jabs too and don't want to believe the data that has come out since the gene therapy shots began? Sure hope you didn't take them because I just lost a family member due to the jabs. Seems you are the one promoting false/misleading information!
 

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,617
Likes
1,225
Points
558
Location
Drifting the high plains
I honestly would be surprised if he is a United States citizen...who knows. The guy for sure knew what he was doing and I wouldn't be surprised if the things he left were on purpose...:unsure:

Plus, if they are correct on that handgun...that sucker costs $5700...not your average Joe buys one of those.
I thought at the beginning that no one is this stupid and most of the evidence he left may have been intended to deceive. For example everyone thinks his gun was jamming. Was this on purpose so that he could catch his spent cases? People will say can't you read they found the cases with deny, defend, depose engraved on them. They found cases, but if he was intelligent instead of stupid he would have picked up like cases (not random) at a gun range, engraved them, altered the gun to catch his brass, and dumped the decoy brass at the scene. Or he maybe left his cases and now polished the handgun bore, chamber, and bolt face, and switched out his fireing pin. Also if he had an accomplice they could have used his identification and credit card, and stayed in a motel 1000 miles away that night. I wonder how much face altering makeup he had on in that picture. If I had to pick intelligent or stupid I would have to flip a coin.
 
Last edited:

Tommyboy

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Posts
974
Likes
239
Points
228
Location
Grand Forks, ND
Id say it was professional hit. The picture they have of the guy at the hostel is not the same guy. Different jacket and backpack. The shooter is gone. Out of the country.
 

Browneye

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Posts
572
Likes
439
Points
220
Location
Flasher
I know alot of people feel this was done by someone that was mad at the insurance industry. If there is anything you can bank on is this has nothing to do with what the news and the experts are telling us. I think its a safe bet this was done for money or to cover up the money that someone in power made in a not so legal way. Just like the Vegas shooting real reason may never be known by us common folk.
 


jer79

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 7, 2015
Posts
470
Likes
874
Points
280
I came across this yesterday, i agree with their theory that it was not a station 6 gun. Just your typical striker fired pistol and probably a homemade suppressor.
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,725
Likes
1,511
Points
488
Location
Space
Id say it was professional hit. The picture they have of the guy at the hostel is not the same guy. Different jacket and backpack. The shooter is gone. Out of the country.
Agree this guy is long gone..law will probably try and pin it on an innocent guy so they don't get heat.
 


Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
1,846
Likes
1,187
Points
433
Location
Burleigh county
I thought at the beginning that no one is this stupid and most of the evidence he left may have been intended to deceive. For example everyone thinks his gun was jamming. Was this on purpose so that he could catch his spent cases? People will say can't you read they found the cases with deny, defend, depose engraved on them. They found cases, but if he was intelligent instead of stupid he would have picked up like cases (not random) at a gun range, engraved them, altered the gun to catch his brass, and dumped the decoy brass at the scene. Or he maybe left his cases and now polished the handgun bore, chamber, and bolt face, and switched out his fireing pin. Also if he had an accomplice they could have used his identification and credit card, and stayed in a motel 1000 miles away that night. I wonder how much face altering makeup he had on in that picture. If I had to pick intelligent or stupid I would have to flip a coin.
My thoughts too…. Loose ends could have been intentional.
 

bravo

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
751
Likes
663
Points
298
We’ll all have moved on to the latest and greatest conspiracy / outrage bait by then.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,070
Likes
2,266
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
Yahoo News

UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting updates: Police identify Luigi Mangione as person of interest detained in Altoona, Pa.​

Katie Mather, Dylan Stableford and Kate Murphy
Updated Mon, December 9, 2024 at 2:49 PM EST
22.3k

Person wearing face mask and hoodie looking through sliding window from back seat of taxi. Title on image reads: NYPD Crime Stoppers, 1-800-577-8477 (TIPS)

This undated photo released by the New York Police Department shows a suspect in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in a taxi on Dec. 4. Part of the image was blurred by the source. (NYPD via AP)

Authorities in New York City said Monday that police in Altoona, Pa. have arrested a "strong person of interest" in last week's fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in midtown Manhattan.

At a press conference, police identified the person of interest as 26-year-old Luigi Mangione, who was spotted at a McDonald's in Altoona and taken into custody by local police on gun charges. Mangione was found in possession of a ghost gun and suppressor consistent with the weapon seen in video footage of the crime, a fake New Jersey ID matching the one the suspect is believed to have used at a Manhattan hostel and clothing, including a mask, that match those worn by the suspect. Police also said Mangione was in possession of a handwritten document that speaks to his motivation and mindset.

Officers with the NYPD are traveling to Pennsylvania today to question Mangione.
This is a developing story. Follow along below for live updates.
 

snow2

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2022
Posts
985
Likes
659
Points
258
Should be a interesting night,aggressive protesters already acting up on nyc streets,these blck blm ppl need to stand down,they railroaded 4 mpls cops two years ago because of mob threats then mpls still burned. Shamefull
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 232
  • This month: 130
  • This month: 103
  • This month: 85
  • This month: 69
  • This month: 63
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 55
  • This month: 51
  • This month: 49
Top Bottom