How long are we supposed to pay for education if you do not have kids? Why should someone have to pay for these services they are not using? My property tax bill is roughly 70% going to the school I have no kids attending! Why should old people fear losing their homes that are paid for to send someone elses kids to school?
The schools will tell you that their presence raises your property value. So, even if you don't have kids, or your kids have already gone through school, you are receiving a daily benefit by a school/schools being within your county/city/neighborhood. Just like treated water, paved roads, and underground utilities add value to your property, schools will tell you they do the same.
I wonder if there are more folks reading here that are able to accurately describe MILS as they apply to optics and trajectory or mills as they apply to taxes?
And that would be my objection to the current system. An antiquated measurement system that very few understand and cannot coherently debate. Again, it's too easy for current politicians to lay the current funding mechanisms at the feet of folks who put those mechanisms in place before any currently sitting public servant's grandparents were born.
I want today's sitting politicians to be 100% fully accountable for writing the manner of today's funding mechanisms.
We'd get a significantly clearer picture of exactly whom supports what in regards to how, where, and when public funds are allocated and used.
I want accountability, it's a foregone conclusion that even by eliminating property taxes, I'm not going to save any $$.