Bring back Flatheads in ND

deleted user

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
1,097
Likes
1,166
Points
408
20k is probably the necessary number to provide a stable fishery. I highly doubt they assume 100% put and take.
 


dblkluk

★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2016
Posts
488
Likes
130
Points
185
How about some steelhead? Or stocking Cisco or lake herring…..🤷🏼 whenever I hear about about reasons to not try to reintroduce lake trout I hear excuses but no valid reasons that couldnt be achieved without a bit of effort….the east end isnt exactly known as a walleyes factory like further upriver…..throw some steelhead or browns in and see what happens 🤷🏼 it just seems to me rhey are stuck on walleyes in ND and will pump millions into stocking unsustainable lakes but can’t give a bit of effort to ramp up our cold water fisheries into something even better…..


I would like nothing more than for them to resume stocking the tailrace with Cutthroats. Any one who remembers the glory days of the state record being broke every 2 weeks will remember how much fun those are.

I think they've done a great job on developing some of the small fisheries around the state in the last decade or so but also agree they have wasted a lot of time and effort on some duds just because they think everyone wants 10 perch and walleye lakes within 30 minutes of their house.
 

Sum1

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Posts
4,996
Likes
603
Points
378
Location
Bismarck
And why the hell would they put catfish in fish creek🤦🏻‍♂️
 


svnmag

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
20,261
Likes
4,797
Points
958
Location
Here
The cuts were hyped up quite a bit then...I caught one 10in in 2000.
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,395
Likes
2,254
Points
678
Location
Burleigh county
I think natural mortality rate (i.e. getting eating by bigger things, croaking from stress/diseases, etc.) far outpaces our ability or inability to tease them out of the water on hook and line...
Right and I totally agree. Im sure they factor in mortality rate upon stocking and probably have an idea of how many fish will even make it past the first month…. So they assume a lot of fish are going to die by natural mortality and then they factor in angler harvest as well. That’s kind of my point as well. They know that it’s inevitable they’ll have mortality. And actually the mortality rate in a probably 95% of our little lakes is 100%. Without stocking efforts there wouldnt be fish. So if there’s no harm to the forage nor any severe impact why not dump 5k lakers in sakakawea sporadically 🤷🏼 or 10k cutthroats or browns or rainbows….. they don’t seem to mind knowing all those walleyes won’t survive so why do they care if 5k lakers eventually die…. 🤷🏼 why would they care about a few thousand cold water fish dying when half a million salmon die yearly and just as many walleyes die statewide…. Isnt the point of stocking, especially these little ass lakes for angler enjoyment…..so how is 5k lakers that will probably die but could provide angler enjoyment any different?….. we stock little lakes knowing they’ll die…. How come the conversation turns to “they’ll never make it in Sak” with lake trout…. Who cares 🤷🏼 if 35 fish make it to 15-20 pounds and an occasional trout is caught then I’d say it’s worth it when you consider the mortality rates of other fish rhey seem fine with……
 

Twitch

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 14, 2015
Posts
2,724
Likes
800
Points
433
Location
Mandan
I think they should kill all of Sakakawea and stock just snook and tarpon…they’ll probably all die but maybe it would be fun if one lived to be caught….#walleye and salmon suck
 


Twitch

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 14, 2015
Posts
2,724
Likes
800
Points
433
Location
Mandan
Cool story bro
They tried what you want. It didn’t work. They aren’t going to possibly jeopardize the more popular fishery to retry things that didn’t work with our water temps and forage. Sak isn’t Peck or Oahe. If you want to go catch lakers go to Peck
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,395
Likes
2,254
Points
678
Location
Burleigh county
They tried what you want. It didn’t work. They aren’t going to possibly jeopardize the more popular fishery to retry things that didn’t work with our water temps and forage. Sak isn’t Peck or Oahe. If you want to go catch lakers go to Peck
They tried it 35 years ago……. Try again…. I apologize Im not the shrug my shoulders and accept the “thats just how it is” types of attitude. Im not content standing in a circle….reverse palming my Johnson with the rest of the huk crowd over a bunch of 14” walleyes…. Welp boys they tried 35 years ago one time, shit good enough for me I guess. If it’s a temp thing… and they don’t do well on smelt then throw some in…see what happens
 
Last edited:

Bfishn

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Posts
3,934
Likes
401
Points
368
And why the hell would they put catfish in fish creek🤦🏻‍♂️
I think they are trying things to try and take care of the blue gill and bull head population. They have been stocking tiger trout in there as well. Part of me thinks they should just kill the entire thing and start over.
 


KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
9,974
Likes
3,039
Points
798
Location
Valley City
I think a couple dozen semi loads of channel catfish in Lake Ashtabula or any lake that has too many bullheads would turn those lakes bullheads into something folks would enjoy tangling with AND putting in the hot oil at the end of the day. Seems to me controlling bullheads with catfish would be a better way to spend resources than trying to force trout or other fish to live where they aren't normally found. Even if folks don't want to eat catfish. I for one would rather catch a catfish than a bullhead. Just an old grey beards opinion though.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,562
Likes
2,969
Points
783
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
Because they died, there's like a virus or something that kills them
Whirling disease?

I know ND isn't immune to whirling disease, but also didn't know it was that big of a problem. Or, maybe there's another pathogen?
 

MSA

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
2,207
Likes
653
Points
458
Location
Minot
Whirling disease?

I know ND isn't immune to whirling disease, but also didn't know it was that big of a problem. Or, maybe there's another pathogen?
No, it's called imfullofshitiosis...its a virus designed to keep other anglers attention away from what I'm doing until Ive reached my goal of a trout over 20lbs
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 230
  • This month: 69
  • This month: 55
  • This month: 55
  • This month: 50
  • This month: 41
  • This month: 34
  • This month: 27
  • This month: 26
  • This month: 25
Top Bottom