The best days of the badlands are gone, there's just to much pressure on those public lands. I score allot of the biggest deer in the state each year and the vast majority of the best muleys come off private lands, its not even close. They can control what is being harvested and now days on allot of ranches if its not 180 gross its not getting shot, at least by the adults. And I think the oil field has really put the hurt on the muleys as well, from both poaching and getting hit on the roads. Can't imagine how many get smoked by trucks every week.
And you will also start to see more and more leasing and outfitters as the years go on state wide.
Hate to say it but social media is the demise of good hunting across the country. Information is way to readily available these days with the click of a button
And with things like ND bucks and bulls it just adds fuel to that fire for our state.
Loose lips sink ships...
Oh and having rifle season smack dab during the rut is a shame...sorry but it is. Nothing easier to kill than a buck muley in November.
Not an expert either but I don't think he's going to score as high as he appears. First, he's not overly wide, barely out to his ears, not past. Narrow frequently turns into shorter main beams. Does have big eye guards which will add since lots of mulies don't have them. Decent forks but I still think the lack of width is going to reduce his overall score. That and his body and face don't look very old.
Regardless, I'd have a hard time passing him up because if nothing else I think he's a really good looking deer. A few extras on him also add in. Since I'm not strictly a trophy hunter I'm pretty sure I'd shoot him and be happy, even with some ground shrinkage.
186 5/8 with a 16.5” inside spread I would have never guessed him that much I figured 170s but he had 13” of trash so plus long brows
Because he is dead and has been scored. Not my deer to post pics of. Though all the ones I’ve seen of him don’t do him justice alive or dead. Biggest one they seen all season I don’t think they knew what they had until everything got added up. Around 81” side 76” side 16.5” spread and 13”of extras. Unless there is another one with those brows and extras floating around.How did you come to this exact conclusion? Are more pictures available
Because he is dead and has been scored. Not my deer to post pics of. Though all the ones I’ve seen of him don’t do him justice alive or dead. Biggest one they seen all season I don’t think they knew what they had until everything got added up. Around 81” side 76” side 16.5” spread and 13”of extras. Unless there is another one with those brows and extras floating around.
I had the 4C tag this year and did not fill it. Hunted 100% public land. For a few reasons, I've hardly hunted the badlands before but was able to do a little bit of scouting prior to the season. Had some help from a friend on where to go and altogether, hunted 8 full days. Most days I saw the truck very little in the daylight and hunted hard. Was very surprised how many forkhorns are out there. I figured I saw around 75-80 bucks and I bet 50-60 of them were forkhorns. Saw maybe half a dozen bucks that were 140-160 but never anything bigger than that. I wasn't going to shoot anything unless it was at least respectable and don't regret it. Next year, somebody can shoot one of the ones I passed when it is 160+. Saw 3 or 4 in the 140-160 range on the last 2 days of season so those should be very nice bucks next year.
One thing that blows my mind are the guys that wait 4-8 years for a 4C tag and then just cruise Magpie, Blacktail and Frank's Creek roads. I mean really? You just expect to see a 170" standing by the road when there is a hunter going by every 5 minutes? I couldn't believe how few people I saw out walking. I never saw 1 bootprint more than a mile from a road. Hell I never saw a hunter in the field more than a quarter mile from a road. I don't understand people.
As expressed before this is what is happening to the good bucks 150-160" are shooter quality to many I guess,;:;banghead add this to all the extra bowhunters and public land owners and out of staters allowed to hunt along with advancements in technology, thus the lack of 170-190+". Hard for them to get to 180+ when they are getting targeted and actively hunted at 140-160" stage. At least before people could just drive around and shoot a forky and head home now days everyone is a back country mule deer expert, but would be lost without onix, taking pictures for the internet of all those mature 140-160" deer ;:;rofl. for the record I don't care what size deer is a trophy to you, or what size deer you shoot, it's your right to shoot what you want and that is fine with me.My best friend and some of his friends spent the last week of gun season last fall in 4d . One had the rifle tag the other 2 had bow tags , these guys leave the pickup before sunup and get back to it at dark . They said the quality of bucks was fantastic, lots of 3.5 year olds and older . The two they shot with archery were probably 150”ish and the rifle buck about 160” but they said they missed opportunities on some better bucks . They said there was 140” bucks everywhere. They said they’ll be going back same week this year with stick and string . Not sure if any drew the gun tag .
As expressed before this is what is happening to the good bucks 150-160" are shooter quality to many I guess,;:;banghead add this to all the extra bowhunters and public land owners and out of staters allowed to hunt along with advancements in technology, thus the lack of 170-190+". Hard for them to get to 180+ when they are getting targeted and actively hunted at 140-160" stage. At least before people could just drive around and shoot a forky and head home now days everyone is a back country mule deer expert, but would be lost without onix, taking pictures for the internet of all those mature 140-160" deer ;:;rofl. for the record I don't care what size deer is a trophy to you, or what size deer you shoot, it's your right to shoot what you want and that is fine with me.
Apparently 150-160 is shooter quality to you too , I mean , pictures don’t lie . Your 2005 thin horned buck isn’t 170-180 . Your 2016 buck isn’t a record breaker . In all your dead deer photos I never saw a 180” . So maybe you need to look in the mirrorAs expressed before this is what is happening to the good bucks 150-160" are shooter quality to many I guess,;:;banghead add this to all the extra bowhunters and public land owners and out of staters allowed to hunt along with advancements in technology, thus the lack of 170-190+". Hard for them to get to 180+ when they are getting targeted and actively hunted at 140-160" stage. At least before people could just drive around and shoot a forky and head home now days everyone is a back country mule deer expert, but would be lost without onix, taking pictures for the internet of all those mature 140-160" deer ;:;rofl. for the record I don't care what size deer is a trophy to you, or what size deer you shoot, it's your right to shoot what you want and that is fine with me.
;:;popcorn