A quick google search for me brought up a Forbes article showing where most "oil subsidies" were in fact tax breaks that were not at all exclusive to oil companies.
I've been reading about this transmission line going into MN from the coal creek plant. Can someone with some knowledge of it explain how they came to acquire the land to put it up? Do they pay all the farmers monthly to have it run across their land? Why can't land owners tell GRE to get that shit off their property?
A quick google search for me brought up a Forbes article showing where most "oil subsidies" were in fact tax breaks that were not at all exclusive to oil companies.
I've been reading about this transmission line going into MN from the coal creek plant. Can someone with some knowledge of it explain how they came to acquire the land to put it up? Do they pay all the farmers monthly to have it run across their land? Why can't land owners tell GRE to get that shit off their property?
PG says,
I am all for keeping the plants open too. I will tell you the little I do know about the atmospheric carbon. German satelites monitoring atmospheric carbon could not understand why high carbon content in the atmosphere was significantly reduced as it entered Minnesota. Plants as they grow take in carbon and give off oxygen. As the plant growes above and below ground it is storing carbon. So they looked at farm fields and they provided no storage because the carbon is released when its plowed. The same with CRP when they looked at it. Storage was only seasonal or temporary at best. Pasture land does provide some permanent storage, but the biomass of their root systems is small, and did not account for the reduced atmospheric carbon as it passed through North Dakota. The answer was wetlands with their huge biomass of root systems. Up to 35 tons ler acre was stored in wetlands. Of course if you drain and plow it fizzes off like opening a bottle of champain.
Pull together the coal companies, the conservation organizations, and you may then even pull in some gov money on the grounds of environmentally friendly coal.
guys says,
Can't wait for Fritz and his advisor to figure out how to twist this in order to throw "the retired fed" under the bus.
Are the workers union?
They’ve been working on carbon capture for a long time now. And the coal fired plants are extremely clean now. Most of what you actually see I think is water vapor.
like agriculture?
"did you get a stimulus check"
I did and spent it right away to help keep local businesses going. But I will tell you I paid more federal income tax last year than I received in stimulus.
#nostimulusforme figured trump would at least send me an autograph thanking me for all the ot I worked last year and income tax I paid.We all did and we will pay for it dearly in the future.
nopedid you get a stimulus check?
my brother in law works at the Koch refinery in MN. Few years ago they built a special addition to the plant just to refine the tar sands oil. They are running full capacity for that oil. They get it cheap as hell because it’s so bad and there is pretty much nobody that can refine it or want to piss around with it.There is a guy here at Metigoshe that is an engineer on drilling rigs in northern Alberta. (Davey you may know him.) He says that they are drilling in a wet gas field and some wells produce 1000 bbl per day of high grade "drip." They used to separate the drip from the natural gas and add the drip to the HEAVY tar sand oil so the tar sand oil would go down the pipeline and the gas went to the Chicago area in a pipeline. Now there is no room to sent the tar sand oil/drip to a refinery facility, so the wells are shutting down, no more gas is being produced and he is out of work.
Wife's cousin's husband worked at Antelope Station (I think that was the plant) and he told me that they used 19% of the generated electricity to run/scrub/clean the plant. They only had 81% of their generating capacity to sell.
Its 10% and that is not figured into the capacity. If your plant is 500mw, about 50mw goes into running it (station service), there are a lot of big motors associated with the process. but the plant would be rated at 450mw and probably have an urge rating around 490mw, which means that for a short period of time the plant could potentially operate at 540mw gross netting 490mw. Or equal to about 1620 North Dakota Wind Towers capacity. or 2500 Minnesota Wind Towers Capacity (less wind)
- - - Updated - - -
Current Mix in the MISO market, keep in mind at this moment of posting the wind was favorable for producing power. Fossil Fuels still rule the roost. And it is not going anywhere without HUGE $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and loss of reliability.
Only three?? A simple google search will net you about 10 different direct and indirect subsidies the crude oil industry gets or has gotten.
Thank you for that. ^^^^^^
Not exactly true there are a ton of refineries that want heavy oil. Maybe you are talking about a sour crude. The Great Lakes refineries are all fitted to refine this oil that originally came from over seas and now is mainly supplied by Canada. Refineries like oil sands oil because it makes more of the asphalt than a Bakken crude does. That is probably why Koch is running heavy oil right now to meet the demand of asphalt while the demand for all other fuels is very low. This oil from Canada is cheap because they are over supplied and have limited transport options just like Bakken crude.my brother in law works at the Koch refinery in MN. Few years ago they built a special addition to the plant just to refine the tar sands oil. They are running full capacity for that oil. They get it cheap as hell because it’s so bad and there is pretty much nobody that can refine it or want to piss around with it.
The demand for condensate will come back as soon as the demand for fuels in the US comes back. The refineries in the Midwest rely on Canada for their oil so they can ramp back up once the refineries are ready.There is a guy here at Metigoshe that is an engineer on drilling rigs in northern Alberta. (Davey you may know him.) He says that they are drilling in a wet gas field and some wells produce 1000 bbl per day of high grade "drip." They used to separate the drip from the natural gas and add the drip to the HEAVY tar sand oil so the tar sand oil would go down the pipeline and the gas went to the Chicago area in a pipeline. Now there is no room to sent the tar sand oil/drip to a refinery facility, so the wells are shutting down, no more gas is being produced and he is out of work.
No that’s not what I’m talking about. They have had this addition to their refinery going for a few years. It’s sole purpose was to refine the tar sands oil. They get it very cheap. Tar sands oil makes up only a fraction of the oil from Canada93% of Federal subsidies goes to renewables. 7% to fossil fuels. And a majority of our energy comes from fossils fuels. New argument please!
- - - Updated - - -
Not exactly true there are a ton of refineries that want heavy oil. Maybe you are talking about a sour crude. The Great Lakes refineries are all fitted to refine this oil that originally came from over seas and now is mainly supplied by Canada. Refineries like oil sands oil because it makes more of the asphalt than a Bakken crude does. That is probably why Koch is running heavy oil right now to meet the demand of asphalt while the demand for all other fuels is very low. This oil from Canada is cheap because they are over supplied and have limited transport options just like Bakken crude.
- - - Updated - - -
The demand for condensate will come back as soon as the demand for fuels in the US comes back. The refineries in the Midwest rely on Canada for their oil so they can ramp back up once the refineries are ready.