I'm pretty sure the issue was taxation without representation, not tariffs on tea. However it's been a long time since my third grade teacher taught us that, so I may be a little fuzzy on my history.
I'm pretty sure the issue was taxation without representation, not tariffs on tea. However it's been a long time since my third grade teacher taught us that, so I may be a little fuzzy on my history.
They were actually called import duties from what i understand. Basically taxes on in imports....tariffs for the most part. There was more to it then just this that caused the revelution so like all liberal shit...its misleading. But for them its the ammo they got so they go with it.I'm pretty sure the issue was taxation without representation, not tariffs on tea. However it's been a long time since my third grade teacher taught us that, so I may be a little fuzzy on my history.
Is this supposed to represent a problem exclusive to one party in particular?
For us crayon eaters.Why would it?
Why does he need to clarify?
Sorry.Why would it?
Why does he need to clarify?
Semper Fi and oorah.For us crayon eaters.
Our two party system, business worshippers and perverts. The business worshippers want to destroy creation while the perverts want to worship it. The business worshippers would like to steal our public land for their personal profit. The perverts get their money through corruption.No Party in particular. Both have their own abuses.
which one are you?Our two party system, business worshippers and perverts. The business worshippers want to destroy creation while the perverts want to worship it. The business worshippers would like to steal our public land for their personal profit. The perverts get their money through corruption.
Hold on - Have you cleared this Q with Jiffy?which one are you?
No, I retract..Hold on - Have you cleared this Q with Jiffy?