Number of tags is biological. Number of tags per hunter is political. No one will disagree with that. So why does politics play a role with pronghorn and not whitetail / mule deer?
It's pretty obvious you're trying to fire up your argument of "if bowhunting doesn't have a significant effect on the population, why can't everyone get a pronghorn bow tag?"
"Those dang crybaby bowhunters took them all. If only they'd go to a one tag for Obi system..." You opened the door and brought me into this in post # 30
This is your imagination in overdrive I never asked why everyone can't get a bow tag.
I just posted the question that if it is not a biological reason why are they limiting it to one tag per person.
Pronghorn are not deer. Conversely, deer are not pronghorn. Your tired-ass argument works even worse with pronghorn than it does with deer. I could get into the factors, which include animal behavior, range, population dynamics, hunter effort, etc., but you'll just stomp your feet and stick out your lip, pouting about how all the archers have it better than you. All the factors you have listed have nothing to do with a one tag per person system.
And keep it up with the name calling and negative rep pal. I need a good cry once in a while, and your very clever wordplay and stinging insults are just what I need to get the tears flowing.
