Fester
★★★★★ Legendary Member
Are you saying there wasnt a way to get additional funds if they wete needed to pay for things in the future? If so that is wrong..it allowed locals to figure out how to fund addituonal expenses...abother words if the politicians wanted to spend they would have to justify it with the people....could you imagine that?No facts to support this but my opinion why the property tax bill got shot down is because there wasn't any plans on how to recoup some of the $$ for future needs. That would have been a substantial amount of money that would need to come from some where else.
Sure they could dip into the slush pool that they have but how long would that last ? I suppose they could reinstate the tax if absolutely needed (at a reasonable rate )
Personally I think if they would have cut "everyone's" taxes in half, and used that for a starting point, most people would have been more than happy.
Just my opinion. . .
Controlled Spending should be #1