- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Posts
- 10,935
- Likes
- 657
- Points
- 438
serious question cause you folks seem to have way more experience than me with bullets: other than the potential for lead in the meat (which at one deer a year these days isn't much of an issue for me), is there a reason to not use old fashioned soft points?
Short answer: No, no reason not to use a soft-point of some sort.
I use Barnes TSX because during the years of unlimited doe tags, their extremely reliable performance across multiple bullet diameters, weights, and impact velocities became quite obvious:
Caliber in/Golf-ball sized out, carnage in-between.
It hasn't mattered if I've taken animals just beyond my boot laces or out past 500yds, the wound channels pretty much all look the same.
That said, if I had to go back to shooting a soft-point cup/core of some sort, there's no reason I'd be hampered to any meaningful degree.
The 10 most important things regarding rifle projectiles assuming they're reasonably accurate and sighted in for your rifle IMO:
1. Placement
2. Placement
3. Placement
4. Placement
5. Placement
6. Placement
7. Placement
8. Placement
9. Bullet Construction
10. Headstamp on the brass