That's bs excuse for opposing conservation. If a farmer sells his land to a conservation group then they own it. Your saying you have a right to it more than anyone else because you need room. There are grain surpluses or you wouldn't want to sell to Cuba. Or do you want to support enemies of democracy? All land is currently taken. If land comes up for sale what makes one group of people better than another?Hunting and fishing are great but we also need room to raise our families and make a living.
So if we can deny a wetland is a wetland maybe we can deny farmable land is farmable land.We propose that all farmable land be exempt from wetlands designation and be eligible for drainage.---
Who determines what a nuisance wetland is?We support a mediation program concerning nuisance wetlands in North Dakota.---
Why ranchers can still graze it?We oppose the federal "wild and scenic" designation for any rivers and their tributaries in North Dakota and oppose wilderness land designation in the state.---
What's dishonest about it? Don't you lobby? Is it more dishonest than lobbying for the farm bill?Can't these people find honest employment.
Just admit the Farm Bureau hates conservation. When a section of land comes up for sale and 100 people have the money to buy it and want to buy it which ones have the right to buy it?