It's up to SDSU to review it, not the refs. It seems to me like it was too close to review, probably would've been "stands as called". Lots of calls against NDSU that I disagreed with. Not so much the other way.
Before that though it was booth review on some play. Either way I as expecting more from top 2 teams in fcs. After watching that any talk of fbs should be stopped.
Apples to oranges. You get 22 more scholarships in FBS than FCS. That makes a big difference in depth, especially when you start getting injuries. Both teams have sent several players to the NFL and both have been competitive against upper mid-level FBS teams. They won't win national championships but add 22 scholarships and you might be surprised what they can do. I believe they would at least be competitive and go to a bowl game most years and likely make the playoff occasionally now that they have expanded to 12 teams.
No chance either are a top 12 team. They might go to a Detroit bowl game but would be bottom tier in either sec or big 10. With nil they have even less of a chance than before you could give them 500 scholarships it isn’t mattering they don’t have the money to compete.
They'll both be in PAC10 before to long
What game were you watching? The jacks held almost every play off the edge and off tackle. They’d engage and hold on outside run plays every time. They finally started calling it late in the game
Like I said I was in and out I saw the catch that they ruled incomplete. only flipped back when the real games were on commercial.
Ah makes sense. You were watching the Colorado game with real players
the sideline catch could have been challenged. I think he was in bounds as well. But it wasn’t. Overall I thought the refs did a pretty fair job overall but it definitely tipped to SDSU for most of the game until the end. There was a late hit they didn’t call earlier right in front of the ref where the bison player was no joke 3 feet out of bounds.
