Insanity in Oregon

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,817
Likes
1,620
Points
678
Location
Drifting the high plains
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17LdRCkGBP/
I hope this isnt considered political because anyone who hunts or fishes should be aware of this. Sometimes it's hard to believe something as ridiculous as this is real, but people become more insane year by year. As outdoor enthusiasts we are caught between a rock and a hard spot. People like this will destroy hunting while on the other hand land owners and outfitters will reduce it to a sport only for the wealthy. The youth tomorrow will never experience the freedoms we have experienced today and especially in years past.
 


Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
7,262
Likes
2,515
Points
758
Location
Bismarck
Core rule it would create:
It would become a crime to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly injure, kill, neglect, or sexually violate any animal — except in two narrow cases:
  • Self-defense (to protect yourself, other humans, or other animals from immediate harm)
  • Good veterinary practices
Specific things it would criminalize/make illegal (by removing the current exemptions):
  • Hunting, fishing, and trapping (recreational or commercial)
  • Livestock slaughter for food (beef, pork, chicken, etc.)
  • Most standard farm and ranch practices (artificial insemination/breeding, castration, dehorning, tail docking, etc.)
  • Commercial poultry production and many other forms of animal agriculture
  • Animal research and laboratory testing
  • Killing animals for pest/vermin control (rodents, etc.)
  • Rodeos and certain wildlife management activities
It also tightens the definition of “minimum care” (food, water, shelter, veterinary care) and “sexual assault of an animal” (explicitly including acts done for breeding/agricultural purposes).Other provisions:
  • Creates a new Humane Transition Fund (overseen by a council) to provide grants for job retraining, income support, food assistance, and helping affected industries and workers transition.
  • The changes would take effect 30 days after the election if voters approve it.
Supporters describe it as ending “legalized animal cruelty” and recognizing animals as sentient beings. Opponents (including farm bureaus, hunters, and fishing groups) say it would effectively ban or severely restrict huge parts of Oregon’s agriculture, outdoor recreation, and research sectors.
 

Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
7,262
Likes
2,515
Points
758
Location
Bismarck
Yes — setting traps that kill or injure mice in your house would become illegal if the PEACE Act (IP 28) passes.Here’s exactly why, straight from the official bill text:1. Mice are fully protected animalsThe act defines “animal” as any nonhuman mammal (mice qualify). They get the same legal protections currently given only to dogs and cats.2. It explicitly removes the pest-control loopholeOregon law currently has this exemption (ORS 167.335):
“Reasonable activities undertaken in connection with the control of vermin or pests”
The PEACE Act strikes that entire line (Section 9). Same for other exemptions like hunting/trapping and wildlife management. No more free pass for killing rodents.3. Killing them becomes “animal abuse”The new rule (amended ORS 167.320):
A person commits the crime of animal abuse in the first degree if the person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly … Causes the death of an animal
(except to defend against immediate harm to yourself, other humans, or other animals — or as part of good veterinary practice)
  • Snap traps, glue traps, poison bait, or any lethal method = intentional killing → misdemeanor crime (Class B, up to 364 days in jail and fines; escalates with repeat offenses).
  • Even if you’re just trying to protect your home or prevent disease, it no longer matters. The old “reasonable pest control” defense is gone.
The only narrow exceptions
  • Self-defense — only if the mouse poses an immediate threat (e.g., a rabid one actively attacking). A normal house mouse infestation almost certainly doesn’t qualify.
  • Vet care — you’d have to hire a vet to do it humanely (impractical and expensive for most people).
What about “humane” live traps?The proponents of the PEACE Act themselves say this is still okay. They emphasize in public statements that the measure “does not prevent ‘trapping’ mice, since humane traps have been around for a long time” — you catch them alive and release them elsewhere (park, field, etc.). No injury or death = no crime.But in practice:
  • Releasing house mice outdoors often just creates problems somewhere else.
  • Many people consider that ineffective or even illegal (releasing pests can violate local health codes).
Bottom line for homeowners: Everyday mouse control with kill traps or poison would be criminalized. You’d be forced into live-trap-and-release (or calling expensive professionals). This is one of the reasons opponents call the measure extreme — it doesn’t just hit farms and hunters; it hits regular houses too.This matches the official text and how both sides are describing it. If the measure qualifies for the ballot and passes, this would take effect 30 days later.Want the direct PDF link to the full bill text, or clarification on glue traps / poison specifically? Or how this would interact with landlords / apartments? Just say the word.
 




Rut2much

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
2,985
Likes
926
Points
438
Location
Learing center minnedishu
IMG_4910.jpeg
 

Eatsleeptrap

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
2,061
Likes
6,335
Points
858
They have been at it a while. Last year they passed a bill that eliminated beaver trapping on 100,000 miles of public streams and rivers. From now on, if someone tells me they are from Oregon, I am just going to walk away. Not worth one second of my time.
 

Eatsleeptrap

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
2,061
Likes
6,335
Points
858
I'm so glad our state passed an amendment to the state constitution that allows hunting and fishing as a God given right!
"Hunting, trapping, and fishing and the taking of game and fish are a valued part of our heritage and will forever be preserved for the people and managed by law and regulation for the public good."
God bless North Dakota.
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 132
  • This month: 46
  • This month: 28
  • This month: 22
  • This month: 20
  • This month: 19
  • This month: 17
  • This month: 15
  • This month: 13
  • This month: 13
Top Bottom