What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Insanity in Oregon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lycanthrope" data-source="post: 482970" data-attributes="member: 562"><p>Core rule it would create:</p><p>It would become a crime to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly injure, kill, neglect, or sexually violate any animal — except in two narrow cases:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Self-defense (to protect yourself, other humans, or other animals from immediate harm)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Good veterinary practices</li> </ul><p>Specific things it would criminalize/make illegal (by removing the current exemptions):</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Hunting, fishing, and trapping (recreational or commercial)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Livestock slaughter for food (beef, pork, chicken, etc.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Most standard farm and ranch practices (artificial insemination/breeding, castration, dehorning, tail docking, etc.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Commercial poultry production and many other forms of animal agriculture</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Animal research and laboratory testing</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Killing animals for pest/vermin control (rodents, etc.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rodeos and certain wildlife management activities</li> </ul><p>It also tightens the definition of “minimum care” (food, water, shelter, veterinary care) and “sexual assault of an animal” (explicitly including acts done for breeding/agricultural purposes).Other provisions:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Creates a new Humane Transition Fund (overseen by a council) to provide grants for job retraining, income support, food assistance, and helping affected industries and workers transition.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The changes would take effect 30 days after the election if voters approve it.</li> </ul><p>Supporters describe it as ending “legalized animal cruelty” and recognizing animals as sentient beings. Opponents (including farm bureaus, hunters, and fishing groups) say it would effectively ban or severely restrict huge parts of Oregon’s agriculture, outdoor recreation, and research sectors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lycanthrope, post: 482970, member: 562"] Core rule it would create: It would become a crime to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly injure, kill, neglect, or sexually violate any animal — except in two narrow cases: [LIST] [*]Self-defense (to protect yourself, other humans, or other animals from immediate harm) [*]Good veterinary practices [/LIST] Specific things it would criminalize/make illegal (by removing the current exemptions): [LIST] [*]Hunting, fishing, and trapping (recreational or commercial) [*]Livestock slaughter for food (beef, pork, chicken, etc.) [*]Most standard farm and ranch practices (artificial insemination/breeding, castration, dehorning, tail docking, etc.) [*]Commercial poultry production and many other forms of animal agriculture [*]Animal research and laboratory testing [*]Killing animals for pest/vermin control (rodents, etc.) [*]Rodeos and certain wildlife management activities [/LIST] It also tightens the definition of “minimum care” (food, water, shelter, veterinary care) and “sexual assault of an animal” (explicitly including acts done for breeding/agricultural purposes).Other provisions: [LIST] [*]Creates a new Humane Transition Fund (overseen by a council) to provide grants for job retraining, income support, food assistance, and helping affected industries and workers transition. [*]The changes would take effect 30 days after the election if voters approve it. [/LIST] Supporters describe it as ending “legalized animal cruelty” and recognizing animals as sentient beings. Opponents (including farm bureaus, hunters, and fishing groups) say it would effectively ban or severely restrict huge parts of Oregon’s agriculture, outdoor recreation, and research sectors. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
World Cup 2026
Latest: Rowdie
18 minutes ago
O
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Today at 7:39 PM
Chorizo
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 3:01 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 12:03 PM
oahe
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 12:01 PM
OFFICIAL 2026 Deer Gun Lottery
Latest: Bed Wetter
Today at 6:54 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:52 PM
Zebra Mussels Discovered in Twin Lakes
Latest: MSA
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Lawnmower starting issue
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 4:30 PM
RR
Red River 6-18-26
Latest: CatDaddy
Thursday at 10:46 PM
The End of New Rounds?...(yt)
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:11 PM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 5:56 PM
Long sleeve hot weather shirts
Latest: MSA
Thursday at 3:02 PM
Looking for a German Shepard
Latest: Lycanthrope
Thursday at 1:56 PM
Galena, KS
Latest: Obi-Wan
Thursday at 12:47 PM
Not just pheasants in Pembina
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Thursday at 10:03 AM
Ozempic Face
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 12:26 PM
O
Tour Level Gold - Sak
Latest: OL Deadeye
Wednesday at 8:03 AM
O
Early Fawns
Latest: OL Deadeye
Wednesday at 7:58 AM
Food porn
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:34 PM
I Like Fun Facts
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 9:08 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Insanity in Oregon
Top
Bottom