gst,
Their being able to remove the mobile homes was always a condition of the lease as far as I know, that's what has always differentiated these sites from those with permanent structures. Problem was when the shit hit the fan, not a single one of them got moved (again, that I am aware of). Lack of tires, attached decks and sheds, and poor access due to mud and snow covered roads, etc. It just didn't happen. So yes, when you can't live up to the previous conditions and expectations, one should expect something to change in order to help you meet your obligations to Big Brother and your neighbors.
- - - Updated - - -
p.s. BOR does have law enforcement.
So then why is the BOR considering allowing them to stay if they follow anchoring requirements?
Why would the BOR permit the building of "sheds" and decks?
It certainly seems from a willingnesss of the BOR to "permit" the building of these things the leasers were indeed following what the "previous conditions and expectations" the BOR allowed.
So allen, if you were renting that pasture from me to graze your cattle and I told you go ahead and drill your water well and then the next year told you well I changed my mind, I am only going to allow you to graze lamas because I don;t want cattle in that pasture, would you go out and buy lamas or would you be pissed and bitch and threaten to go to court until I paid you back for drilling that well?
Would you think I was being a jackass after 40 years of letting you graze cattle to demand you buy lamas instead?
- - - Updated - - -
Allen, do you have concern over these Federal agencies such as the USDA arming themselves with automatic weapons in their enforcement agencies?
Do you believe the Separation of powers the Founders intended are being followed when these Federal agencies use their own law enforcment depts rather than using the county sheriffs , state law enforcement or other designated Federal law enforcement branches?