If it was written better I would be a for sure yes, but I'm on the fence. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard it was going to be taxed but not taxed as much as alcohol and there is no limit on how much you can possess?
It was intentionally written to be very open ended so legislature can shape it how they see fit. This has been stated several times by the creator of this measure. Unfortunately the anti groups are using this to sow fear into people, stating that legislature wont do anything and it will be the wild west of weed.
Ive spoken personally to 4 legislators and they all acknowledge that rules and restrictions will need to be added. Also to add rules and restrictions, it will only take a 50% vote. It would take a 75% vote to repeal or remove anything currently defined in M3 (that is why it was left very open ended), like clearing past convictions. Every state has gone through an evolutionary process as far as rules go after legalization has passed, ND would be no different.
Currently it will be taxed at the same rate everything else in the state is, but legislature will likely add additional taxes on top of this, similar to how alcohol and tobacco products are currently taxed...