Pronghorn Drawing held

Zogman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
5,410
Likes
2,837
Points
733
Location
NW Angle, MN and Grand Forks, ND
No amount of points matter if everyone is right in the mix with you. You end up with same odds just another year down the road.

Someone correct me but didn't the lottery back in the day 80s 90s ran that if you drew an antelope tag you couldn't apply for another 3 years or something like that
I believe you are correct.
 


Obi-Wan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,081
Likes
7,726
Points
1,008
Location
Bismarck
No amount of points matter if everyone is right in the mix with you. You end up with same odds just another year down the road.

Someone correct me but didn't the lottery back in the day 80s 90s ran that if you drew an antelope tag you couldn't apply for another 3 years or something like that
Weren’t mule deer tags similar regards to not being able to apply for a year back then?
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
17,834
Likes
13,072
Points
983
No amount of points matter if everyone is right in the mix with you. You end up with same odds just another year down the road.

Someone correct me but didn't the lottery back in the day 80s 90s ran that if you drew an antelope tag you couldn't apply for another 3 years or something like that
Exactly!! That's why if you switch it to the method I listed one year of points will matter exponentially!! Those with 6 + points will have a huge advantage from they have now.
 

Jiffy

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2018
Posts
3,169
Likes
3,189
Points
753
Location
West of Minntucky
A: The game and fish doesn’t care about what we think “huntable” numbers are.

B: They sell tags, that’s their business

C: Gratis tags are a leftover byproduct of a time gone by. It’s apparently never going away no matter what.

Pronghorn in ND don’t do well. Especially when we keep killing them. 😂
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2023
Posts
580
Likes
466
Points
150
hmm well huntable n sustainable are two diffrent things n the game n fish gets em both wrong on purpose to steal our tax dollers control our food sources n infring on our landowner rights theres no reason them antelopes shouldnt be back to their heyday numbers so what if 90 per cent of their habitats is gone from oil n ag wheres my tag
 


Tymurrey

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Posts
482
Likes
259
Points
245
The habit is never coming back. Believe me when I say it WILL get worse. Check back in 10 years.
The only way to combat the habitat loss is to put a value on habitat and wildlife. I know there is a lot of hate on gratis/landowner tags on here but that is one way to put a value on habitat and wildlife. I think it is a great time for those that want to increase habitat between cost share for trees, grassland and wildflower seed programs, and some of the programs offered by government agencies to conserve grasslands. Land is being inherited by family members who aren't present and don't care about the land besides the money they can make off it. The land i bought in wyoming came from 5 sisters who only one had ever set foot on the land before when she was a kid. Their family had homesteaded the land and all they wanted was to get rid of it. When pasture rent or hayland is half of what cropland rent is, why not farm what you can. My family is breaking up acres as i'm trying to put it back into trees and grassland but i value wildlife and they don't hunt much.
 

1lessdog

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2019
Posts
2,043
Likes
1,351
Points
493
When my Uncle died about 8 yrs ago. He was never married so no children. He had 4 siblings that were still alive and 7 siblings that were dead but they had children. The siblings want to keep the land and rent it out. The kids wanted the money so they sold it. He had 13 quarters and it all got sold. They averaged just over 900.00 a acre. If it was sold now it would sell for over 2300.00 a acre. The land was SE of Jamestown 25 miles. With a creek going thru 4 quarters. It was good deer hunting.
 

deleted user

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
1,097
Likes
1,166
Points
408
Ty I agree with you. I was lucky and purchased 200 acres the same way. A family out east who’s never been to ND didn’t want it. The only ag on it is a small food plot and the neighbor hays it for me. Whatever value those bales are to him are the only dollars generated. If I didn’t buy it, it would probably be half plowed up.

More public lands, better paying crp /easements on marginal land. Another thing that could be done is amending the century code that forbids conservation organizations from purchasing land. Write it in some way that access must be guaranteed, I don’t know. All of this is spitballing. Pretty unlikely as most of our lawmakers think every inch should be in production. Before I get jumped on I want to say it’s possible to be pro-conservation and not anti-farmer.
 

Tymurrey

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Posts
482
Likes
259
Points
245
Conservation costs, especially to do it right. Whether that be in time or actually money. Tree maintenance, weed maintenance, food plots, and so on. When I first started my quest to better hunting for myself, family, and friends I didn't make our renters to happy. It's a business and their livelihood and I understood that but i needed to do what i felt was best. Now my renters work with me to have the cattle out when i feel its right or leave some crop so they don't lose all the farm ground to me putting in food plots or cover. I feel like North Dakota needs to start taking notes from other states. Wyoming has HMA's that only allow a certain number of hunters. No access if you weren't drawn for that HMA and designated parking areas. Areas that are only open for certain dates and for certain species. Would this open up areas for upland if it didn't have to open it to deer hunters too. I get a gratis tag but do i think we could do something like Wyoming and require animal usage minimums, absolutely i do. Wyoming also does landowner stubs that landowners get money from if harvested on their land.
 


deleted user

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Posts
1,097
Likes
1,166
Points
408
I remember a lawmaker who pushed e-posting said a season and species specific PLOTS option was part of the deal. Must still be in the works…

I greatly appreciate PLOTS and the landowners who participate. But Wyoming and South Dakota do a great job with habitat and access compared to ND. Montana’s block management is also a good deal. It’s possible here. It’s just going to take more landowners to buy in.
 

Slappy

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Posts
916
Likes
791
Points
323
Location
Bismarck
Exactly!! That's why if you switch it to the method I listed one year of points will matter exponentially!! Those with 6 + points will have a huge advantage from they have now.
LOL your idea works for you if you're the only one that accrues points exponentially.

Would be like selling raffle tickets for a penny instead of a dollar. If everyone spends the same, the odds don't change but you have 100 times the tickets to handle and draw from.
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
17,834
Likes
13,072
Points
983
Here's the math 6 points vs 7.
Now...6^2= 36. Vs 7^2 = 49. Exponentially it is 2^6 = 64 vs 2^7 = 128.

Each doesn't just double your chances but takes 2 times the number of points. Those with more points have a much better Chance over those with just 1 less point and those chances widen every point.
 

CatDaddy

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
4,666
Likes
3,469
Points
823
Here's the math 6 points vs 7.
Now...6^2= 36. Vs 7^2 = 49. Exponentially it is 2^6 = 64 vs 2^7 = 128.

Each doesn't just double your chances but takes 2 times the number of points. Those with more points have a much better Chance over those with just 1 less point and those chances widen every point.
Math is hard!?! This makes sense to me....
 

LBrandt

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Posts
11,288
Likes
2,358
Points
693
Location
SE ND
Like in the unit I live there is no deer tags left after gratis tags are given out and I cannot afford to go elsewhere. LB
 


Slappy

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Posts
916
Likes
791
Points
323
Location
Bismarck
Here's the math 6 points vs 7.
Now...6^2= 36. Vs 7^2 = 49. Exponentially it is 2^6 = 64 vs 2^7 = 128.

Each doesn't just double your chances but takes 2 times the number of points. Those with more points have a much better Chance over those with just 1 less point and those chances widen every point.
You're not the only one with 6 points. And the lottery is already heavily waited to high point holders.

1000028237.jpg
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
17,834
Likes
13,072
Points
983
Thanks for formulas!!

Of course there is more than 1 guy with 6 points. I'm just stating that if you use the formula I offered those who have more points get a much better chance and the gap widens bigger and bigger each year.
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
17,834
Likes
13,072
Points
983
For example those with 10 pts using 2 to the tenth power...(your points) is 1024 vs 730. And one more year would be 2048. The difference in formulas isn't much until getting up to year 9. This chart explains it much better and if you're waiting 10 plus years...wow.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 345
  • This month: 114
  • This month: 82
  • This month: 66
  • This month: 59
  • This month: 58
  • This month: 57
  • This month: 48
  • This month: 41
  • This month: 38
Top Bottom