Conservation costs, especially to do it right. Whether that be in time or actually money. Tree maintenance, weed maintenance, food plots, and so on. When I first started my quest to better hunting for myself, family, and friends I didn't make our renters to happy. It's a business and their livelihood and I understood that but i needed to do what i felt was best. Now my renters work with me to have the cattle out when i feel its right or leave some crop so they don't lose all the farm ground to me putting in food plots or cover. I feel like North Dakota needs to start taking notes from other states. Wyoming has HMA's that only allow a certain number of hunters. No access if you weren't drawn for that HMA and designated parking areas. Areas that are only open for certain dates and for certain species. Would this open up areas for upland if it didn't have to open it to deer hunters too. I get a gratis tag but do i think we could do something like Wyoming and require animal usage minimums, absolutely i do. Wyoming also does landowner stubs that landowners get money from if harvested on their land.