Property Tax Credit



Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,500
Likes
1,375
Points
413
Location
Space
There is no loophole, stock is taxed the same as cash payroll when you take ownership. Capital gains are paid on anything it gained above the amount you already paid taxes on when you sell.
So when a ceo gets paid billions in stock and recieves dividend payments from those stocks that equal a salary...those are taxed at the same rate as they would be taxed for income??? That's a loophole..hey lets pay this guy in stock where he will make just as much in dividend payments but Mr billionaire only pays 15% rate....yeah no loopholes there....(iso,rsu etc) there is a difference...

Blackjack yup..not responding further to tax loopholes..carry on with property
 

FightingSioux

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Posts
771
Likes
419
Points
243
Location
ND
I am as a golden rule as well, but when someone like Elon Musk gets $56 billion in Tesla shares instead of a salary, that kind of grinds my gears. Unless I am mistaken, he doesn't owe anything on that compensation since it comes as a stock. Instead, if he holds it for a year he can then dump it and pay long-term capital gains rates.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong on this!



If, however, you and I (or anyone for that matter) goes out and invests their already taxed money in a stock, I am fine with the system as is where you don't have to pay taxes on the capital gains until it gets cashed out. It seems unnecessarily complicated to expect people to pay taxes on unrealized capital gains.
Tax the share value they receive or don’t allow that as un-taxable income. Taxing unrealized gains is the worst idea I’ve ever heard from a free society
 

FightingSioux

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Posts
771
Likes
419
Points
243
Location
ND
There is no loophole, stock is taxed the same as cash payroll when you take ownership. Capital gains are paid on anything it gained above the amount you already paid taxes on when you sell.
You take ownership of a stock as soon as it’s in your name or fully vested. Us common folk are only allowed to put $23k in our 401k before it gets taxed (and we have to wait until retirement age to cash it out). Explain to me how it’s fair these billionaires and millionaires have no limit on stock options?

MAGA is tired of sticking up for millionaires and billionaires. They don’t need us anyways because they control all the R’s and D’s already!
 

FightingSioux

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Posts
771
Likes
419
Points
243
Location
ND
Thought of a new way to make up the $$$ for property taxes. Since businesses won’t be taxed on their property maybe we need to increase their income tax instead. No reason to give businesses a free ride!

For the record I’m against any federal tax increase for any businesses and I think individuals are the ones who are getting unfair loopholes. Taxing rich individuals won’t hurt businesses or the economy, quit drinking the koolaid! We have a big national debt to pay off!
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,500
Likes
1,375
Points
413
Location
Space
Our state run mill just reported record profit.....the money was placed in the general fund. Someone else brought up our state bank and their record profits. We don't have a taxation problem we have a spending problem and this is at all levels of our gov.
100% agree! The spending problem has been issues for years, but the people keep voting in the same people that have the spending problem..it's very hard to understand.
 

hoythunter

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2015
Posts
51
Likes
7
Points
105
Tax the share value they receive or don’t allow that as un-taxable income. Taxing unrealized gains is the worst idea I’ve ever heard from a free society
The share value is taxed as ordinary income. Musk paid 37% on his stock option.
 

Sluggo

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 14, 2015
Posts
2,645
Likes
521
Points
373
Location
Bismarck
Yep. Spending is the problem. From blue lights so cops can tell when the light turns red, to panels around crosswalks as they replace perfectly good curbs, to trying to prevent every single person from every single hardship. Spend, baby spend.
 

Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
6,474
Likes
1,557
Points
608
Location
Bismarck
The state has more than enough money to eliminate property tax and fund it with funds it already has, there is no need to 'get it somewhere else'. Cut spending on unnecessary projects, fund police with that. As mentioned multiple times now, we dont have an income problem, we have a spending problem, largely due to the jackwads we put in our legislature and gov's office.
 


Fritz the Cat

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Posts
5,099
Likes
668
Points
423
The state has more than enough money to eliminate property tax and fund it with funds it already has, there is no need to 'get it somewhere else'. Cut spending on unnecessary projects, fund police with that. As mentioned multiple times now, we dont have an income problem, we have a spending problem, largely due to the jackwads we put in our legislature and gov's office.
Lycan, I agree with you except jackwad politicians. Our elected representatives are beggared everyday by a citizenry who want gifts and largesse from the general treasury. At the local level it's way hard to buy a representative.

Here is how it works at the federal level:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ted-montana-tech-executives-donated-campaign/

https://www.nrsc.org/press-releases/scandal-tester-allies-caught-paying-for-endorsements-2024-08-26/
 

Greenhorn

★ Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2020
Posts
311
Likes
152
Points
122
Location
Bismarck
Yep. Spending is the problem. From blue lights so cops can tell when the light turns red, to panels around crosswalks as they replace perfectly good curbs, to trying to prevent every single person from every single hardship. Spend, baby spend.
…and Bismarck still takes 5+ days to plow my street
 

espringers

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Posts
8,304
Likes
1,096
Points
488
Location
Devils Lake
it isn't the state's job to pay for plowing your city, township and county roads. it isn't the state's job to fund your city parks and recreation programs. it isn't the state's job to pay for your grade school. it isn't the state's job to fund your... you get the picture. nor should it be! the more local your tax need, taxing authority and tax collection, the more you have the ability to affect change in all of the above IF YOU WISH.

asking the locals to come up with another way to fund stuff is one thing. asking the state to foot the bill is absolutely asinine. how would that even work? we just put together our own township budget, send it to the state and expect them to fund whatever the hell we ask for? imagine the wishlists. you think we have spending problem now? wait and see how that pans out.

or are they going to have discretion? if they have discretion, now we are relying on some legislature from fargo to make budgeting decisions for some township of 50 people north of williston?!
 


Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,500
Likes
1,375
Points
413
Location
Space
it isn't the state's job to pay for plowing your city, township and county roads. it isn't the state's job to fund your city parks and recreation programs. it isn't the state's job to pay for your grade school. it isn't the state's job to fund your... you get the picture. nor should it be! the more local your tax need, taxing authority and tax collection, the more you have the ability to affect change in all of the above IF YOU WISH.

asking the locals to come up with another way to fund stuff is one thing. asking the state to foot the bill is absolutely asinine. how would that even work? we just put together our own township budget, send it to the state and expect them to fund whatever the hell we ask for? imagine the wishlists. you think we have spending problem now? wait and see how that pans out.

or are they going to have discretion? if they have discretion, now we are relying on some legislature from fargo to make budgeting decisions for some township of 50 people north of williston?!
Why not? All the budgets would definitely have more eyes on it as well as more people having a say...maybe town of 50 could get an olympic size swimming pool. Ha
 

espringers

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Posts
8,304
Likes
1,096
Points
488
Location
Devils Lake
i agree there is too much money in the bank in ND. but, again.... that's the state and not the counties. and they should figure out a way to give some back . maybe just cut everyone one a check for x amount of dollars. issue there is its highly unlikely the people who paid said tax that is in the STATE accounts are going to be the ones who get that money back. most of it is from state owned mineral rights and taxes paid by big oil and privately owned mineral rights on those minerals. i suppose we could find a way to give big oil billions back. but, that seems ludicrous as we are likely gonna need it 40 years ago to clean up and generally fund the mess left behind out west. just ranting.
 

NDSportsman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Posts
3,349
Likes
559
Points
353
Location
East Central ND
i agree there is too much money in the bank in ND. but, again.... that's the state and not the counties. and they should figure out a way to give some back . maybe just cut everyone one a check for x amount of dollars. issue there is its highly unlikely the people who paid said tax that is in the STATE accounts are going to be the ones who get that money back. most of it is from state owned mineral rights and taxes paid by big oil and privately owned mineral rights on those minerals. i suppose we could find a way to give big oil billions back. but, that seems ludicrous as we are likely gonna need it 40 years ago to clean up and generally fund the mess left behind out west. just ranting.
Here's an idea, how about the state use that money to fully fund all the schools and fully fund the transportation infrastructure needs of the entire state. After all it's for the kids right? It's bettering the state for our future right?
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
1,500
Likes
1,375
Points
413
Location
Space
This is all like a used car salesman(sorry used car salesman) but what's that saying they go by? If there is any money left in the customers pocket at the end of the sale they haven't don't there job. State gives residents money...the bottom feeders as I call them would just up our property values to suck any and all money transfered down to the people...have to control the spending first...I belueve ending property tax will do that.
 

jake57

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Posts
36
Likes
36
Points
98
here is one thing that I see with the city of Bismarck and I'm sure there are many more cases like this. the lawn clippings dumpsters has a garbage truck and a guy in a pickup following hm around with a pickup and, a shovel., he can't ride with in the truck
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 144
  • This month: 113
  • This month: 84
  • This month: 59
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 49
  • This month: 47
  • This month: 44
  • This month: 42
  • This month: 41
Top Bottom