i think what he really wants to know is: if we got rid of the dike and let the water spread out naturally, how much would the lake level drop overall? i have no answer to that. i suspect it might not be real easy to determine for us regular folk. but, it would involve taking the current acre-foot number, removing the dike for imaginary purposes and seeing how much land that same amount of water would cover and taking a new elevation.
to determine the answer to the question of how much of the city of devils lake will be under water at the current elevation, one really only needs to look at google earth or a good topo map i think.
Yeah that's the way I took his question as well. Over all the difference would be quite small as the dike only protects a relatively small flat area so the acre feet moved around would be low. It would be relatively straight forward to figure out with a topo map and a calculator but that sounds like work. I would bet it would be less then a foot and probably 6 inches or less at the most. Definitely would be considerably less then what stump took.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah plus most all of it has been plowed up for construction over the years and most things lost would have likely been in the top few inches and likely long since gone. The finding of the big anchor out in creel bay would have been fun.No answer for sure lunk but interesting point , Devils Lake has more current than any other closed basin lake I remember fishing. I was thinking about this a couple weeks ago when I was fishing it and watching my bobbers going back and forth across the hole but seldom down the hole. The only explanation I could come up with was the wind gusts moving along and pushing down on the ice. Kind of like ice road truckers , The tidal wave affect ahead of the truck. Even night fishing without wind the current was still strong but that could me momentum. Devils lake doesn't seem as bad as Sakakawea for rough water on a fairly calm day from the wind the day before.
- - - Updated - - -
Be a fun place to metal detect if the owners would approve but I'm sure others have thought the same thing and picked it clean over the years.
- - - Updated - - -
I was always amazed at the current around the bridges even when it was fairly calm there was a current between 57 and the 20 bridges. I never fished six miles as often when I was a kid. The 57 bridge at around 1988 was maybe 8 feet deep all sandy bottom. We would come up to fish during the fourth of July. You could fish the current as a group the farthest from the bridge would cast the farthest left or right depending on the current . Then the next would cast the the next and so on. The best time was when the current stopped for a few minutes the feed was on .
Anyways I have a theory on the current it could be explained as tub filled with couple inches of water then you lift up one side then lift the other causing the water to flow back and forth.
Any ideas
It's almost always wind driven there. Get a strong sustained wind and it will literally stack the water up on the down wind shore then when the wind switches or dies the water tries to level out. Now if your getting a piss load of new water coming in that will often drive her east at the bridge.
Remember back in around 85 we were ice fishing just north up on the west side of 57 and 20 Junction. All of a sudden my uncle pops up off his bucket and yells look at this dumb shit sota! I look over just in time to see the guy drop the front end of his ford bronco through trying to drive under the bridge! As soon as we could see everyone was out the entire town of people laughed harder then I've ever seen! God they were the good old days we caught two full Metal trash cans full of jumbos that day between four of us and I was just a little kid. We sat down stairs at bar in the basement cleaning fish for a couple hours and had a great time laughing about the dumb ass from minasota and wondering how he was going to get home and how the call to his wife went!
Last edited: