SB2137

Pigsticker

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
269
Likes
65
Points
167
Location
Minot
SB_2137.png
I noticed you guys deleted my comment off of your facebook page regarding a section of your letter, so since you put your letter up on Nodak I’ll just respond here. Appreciate you guys partnering with FB on censorship, how Californian of you…

"The state has a property interest in all protected wildlife. This interest supports a civil action for damages for the unlawful destruction of wildlife by willful or grossly negligent act or omission."
Our fellow North Dakotans at the Game and Fish act as our trustees”

NDBHA…that is a great point, especially how it applies to our Game and Fish annihilating OVER 50 DEER utilizing sharp shooters, and wasting over 2,000 lbs of clean meat, only to have not one of those deer test positive for CWD.

I’ll say it louder for the people in the back…

Thats over 50 deer, a whole herd, belonging to the public trust, that were sent to a landfill to rot. Does that seem like a very “scientific” approach to management? 👎🏻
 
Last edited:


BrockW

Honored Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Posts
210
Likes
104
Points
202
I noticed you guys deleted my comment off of your facebook page regarding a section of your letter, so since you put your letter up on Nodak I’ll just respond here. Appreciate you guys partnering with FB on censorship, how Californian of you…

"The state has a property interest in all protected wildlife. This interest supports a civil action for damages for the unlawful destruction of wildlife by willful or grossly negligent act or omission."
Our fellow North Dakotans at the Game and Fish act as our trustees”

NDBHA…that is a great point, especially how it applies to our Game and Fish annihilating OVER 50 DEER utilizing sharp shooters, and wasting over 2,000 lbs of clean meat, only to have not one of those deer test positive for CWD.

I’ll say it louder for the people in the back…

Thats over 50 deer, a whole herd, belonging to the public trust, that were sent to a landfill to rot. Does that seem like a very “scientific” approach to management? 👎🏻
Hey Matt! We haven’t deleted a single comment. But we did have a duplicate post we deleted because of instagram and FB accounts syncing. So your comment might have been on the post we deleted. Sorry if that made you feel excluded or offended.

As far as censorship, that’s kind of funny you mention that, ya know since all of you guys have been hiding behind Dusty’s conspiracy page, which has basically blocked any person who disagrees with you guys. There’s a whole bunch of people I know that he has blocked.

Now that is “laughable”….and very Californian of you all 🤣
 
Last edited:

BrockW

Honored Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Posts
210
Likes
104
Points
202
Does that seem like a very “scientific” approach to management? 👎🏻
In terms of “scientific” approach. I think the department admitted that they messed up in how they handled that incident.

However, at the time that happened there was no known positives in that location and they were concerned that somehow a hot spot popped up that wasn’t caught through surveillance. So the idea was to go in and remove deer in that local area in hope that if they did have a hot spot, they would stamp it out before it established itself. It’s worked in other places, so I don’t fault them for trying it.

But I do think it’s big of you to show such care and compassion for the deer. I would assume that means you’ll stop baiting and feeding so youre not giving deer a contagious and 100% fatal neurological disease. Atta boy, proud of you for prioritizing the resource!
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 121
  • This month: 81
  • This month: 60
  • This month: 59
  • This month: 56
  • This month: 42
  • This month: 40
  • This month: 40
  • This month: 38
  • This month: 33
Top Bottom