I've been wrong before, but you haven't shown that to be the case in this instance. The current law ALLOWS the landowner to decide to post their land closed. You want to change it to a law where the state decided for the landowner and FORCES landowners to post their land open. There is a difference. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Choose to post closed or forced to post open. Get it? Choose to leave open or forced to post closed. Why should someone be forced to post closed when it's an inherent right? Get it?
You want MORE public land for hunters, but want LESS private land to be open to hunters by wanting all private land to be posted. Sounds hypocritical to me looking at it from a hunters point of view as the trespass law results in LESS land for hunters which is why it's an anti-hunting initiative and not a public safety initiative. I don't want less private land open and we don't know for a fact it would be less but it's the right thing to do for private property rights. Again landowners have the right to post it open, put it into PLOTS, etc.
You still haven't shown me where I've advocated for something that does the opposite of what I advocate. Thanks!!You're advocating against property rights by supporting a law that allows people to trespass freely while saying you're for property rights.