Complaining is when you aren't offering solutions, since you didn't notice that's what we are doing. In fact I asked suggestions in my very first post where I talked through all I researched. Care to contribute something useful? Or is shut up and deal with it the best you got even though the general consensus is that there is a problem?
Not only are the NR numbers getting bad but some of them are starting to tie up a bunch of land. This is going to ruin hunting as we know it and pretty soon we will be like Texas where only the rich man can hunt
I'm sure you're not serious about that. That is just a bad idea. Don't make hunting a rich man's sport more than it already is.
You could have coffee with local farmers right now and they would call you when they see birds.
When a dozen decoys can cost upwards of $400 and every Tom Dick and Harry is pulling around an enclosed trailer full of them, I have no problem making the price of a NR lisc go up at least another hundred bucks or so.I'm sure you're not serious about that. That is just a bad idea. Don't make hunting a rich man's sport more than it already is.
Small town economies benefit from NR hunters, capping the number of them would be stupid
It isn't just Texas. SD has sold it's soul to pheasant hunting. The land purchasing, leasing, and commercial operations are slowly killing the resident hunter here. The only thing keeping this from happening with waterfowl hunting is the license cap. But as I said, that is slowly being eroded as well.
Every duck I kilt last year was shot on land open to the public. 13 trips and me and the boy were the only public we saw, except for some road pheasant hunters my 1st day out.
Granted, you aren't exactly in big time waterfowl country as far a NR traffic goes.