i hope it rises a bunch but not enough to flush the smelt as there was never any chance we were going to flood but the high water made awesome habitat.
So the lake has risen more than 15' 4 times. In two of those years it started out pretty low meaning it took less water volume per foot and the corp new they had plenty of space so they likely didn't increase outflow accordingly. That brings us to 1997 and 2011, both large water years and yet still only one caused problems....once in 65 years and the river still didn't even hit a top 20 crest in Bismarck.The state voiced their concerns to the COE in January about the lake level and the snow pack and were told by the COE that they had everything under control.
The lake rising 15' or more from Jan - July is not one isolated incident in 65 years it has happened multiple times, It rose 19.5' in 1978, 14.5' in 1993, 15.0' in 1997, 16.9' in 2009, but only 13'8" in 2011 because it topped out. The severity of the 2011 flood was caused by the arrogance and mismanagement by the COE.
- - - Updated - - -
Thanks for proving my point In March as inflows increased the COE releases from Garrison decreased through the end of April.
Leaving more than 15' of freeboard for flood control would be # 1 I don't think 15' is enough of a cushion for flood control which was proven in 2011 by the lake going from 40.7 to 54.5 at which it tops out, god only knows how much the lake would have risen if they did not open the gates to 150,000.
- - - Updated - - -
https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/missouri-river-flooding-2011
Thanks for proving my point In March as inflows increased the COE releases from Garrison decreased through the end of April.
They knew the snow pack was above normal in January and yet they cut releases in March. Are you talking record releases in the months of June, July, and August .
As Allen said above, you can't manage a system based on an extreme event that might happen once in a hundred years. They could have had 30' of space that year and we still would have flooded. We will never contain mother nature.
I would consider one flood in 65 years to be pretty good "flood control", it would have been so much worse without the dam. Its not "if" the river will flood again its "when", it might be next year, it might be 100 years. If you cant accept that uncertainty, then its time to move to higher ground.
I respectfully disagree.
Reuced flows during river breakup like they do every year not exactly a shock. I bet you were one of the people bitching in 09 that they were letting out too much water as the river Jamed.Thanks for proving my point In March as inflows increased the COE releases from Garrison decreased through the end of April.
They knew the snow pack was above normal in January and yet they cut releases in March. Are you talking record releases in the months of June, July, and August .
Are you saying the river wasn't open until the end of April? You do realize that they did back off on the water releases a couple days before the ice jam broke in 09Reuced flows during river breakup like they do every year not exactly a shock. I bet you were one of the people bitching in 09 that they were letting out too much water as the river Jamed.
Backed off hell they went to zero for awile. Simply put the Corp lower outflow every spring till late March or April when they feel confident the river is in open water mode then they dial her up. As someone who likes to fish on the jetty at the bloodhole where a half foot change makes a big difference my friends and i keep a very close watch over it and have become very familiar with the Corps normal SOP. Unfortunately it won't go back to 09 for some reason but here's 10 through now with each spring marked. You get a big drop when the ice clears then a few weeks and they bring it up to normal summer flows....well save 11 that needless to say was and little crazy.Are you saying the river wasn't open until the end of April? You do realize that they did back off on the water releases a couple days before the ice jam broke in 09