Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land

[guywhofishes]

 

[Weaver]

You really are giving those vibes. Im really trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but you’re making it hard

I have no knowledge of the groups you speak of or what they do. Simply a landowner who wants the crap to stop. Every year it seems I have to deal with a wounded deer story and I have no recourse then to allow them to "hunt" my posted land. Statute says a landowner is supposed to have peaceful enjoyment of their property. Well I'm having little of that with yahoos exploiting the "permission law"

 

[bravo]

For the last time there’s already a law in place forbidding what they are doing. If there is no animal, they are trespassing and you need to report them. No loophole, nothing.

 

[Trip McNeely]

You came here thinking you’d find a forum that doesn’t turn into a dumpster fire? come on man… what are you 12?

 

[Trip McNeely]

I have no knowledge of the groups you speak of or what they do. Simply a landowner who wants the crap to stop. Every year it seems I have to deal with a wounded deer story and I have no recourse then to allow them to "hunt" my posted land. Statute says a landowner is supposed to have peaceful enjoyment of their property. Well I'm having little of that with yahoos exploiting the "permission law"

I have a suggestion that would work well. Find a couple of ethical good dudes or dudettes that you trust who enjoy hunting. Invite them out to hunt the days you can’t be around to help you look after the place. I can promise you those who are graciously invited to hunt someone’s land and have a relationship and respect for it will look after it better than if it were their own. It’s either that or start documenting who is doing it. If it’s a common occurrence where you are then it’s very likely a group or few vegabonds that need a correction anyhow. But changing a law because criminals wanna be criminals seems a bit on the overreactive side

 

[Weaver]

For the last time there’s already a law in place forbidding what they are doing. If there is no animal, they are trespassing and you need to report them. No loophole, nothing.

Your word against theirs and their simple statement “we are looking for a wounded deer “ gives them a pass. That’s the loophole
just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

 

[Weaver]

You came here thinking you’d find a forum that doesn’t turn into a dumpster fire? come on man… what are you 12?

Age is irrelevant to argument. I came here looking for ideas and debate on the subject. I found that. You believe the government should have the authority to access, I believe the landowner should. We’ll leave it at that .

 

[Iwhackwheat]

Your word against theirs and their simple statement “we are looking for a wounded deer “ gives them a pass. That’s the loophole
just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

So the Warden takes their side every time you call them?

 

[1lessdog]

Those were my thoughts. Ive never had to enter private land to retrieve a deer. From the direction this thread is going one of two things is happening here. 1) you are dealing with some nefarious and poor excuses for hunters who are overall shitty people or have an isolated area with a few bad actors that is not representative to the entire state. Or…..2) you are sent here to cause division and plant a seed for upcoming legislation by a group or faction pushing an agenda. Which in and of itself is quite nefarious. You keep calling hunters “a special interest group” Ive never once heard individuals who engage in hunting call themselves that, nor reference other hunters that way…. Something’s stinky over here…..

If people would quit arguing with him he would go away. He has a Scenario for everything brought up. Be smarter then the way your acting.