1. Marshal law is different, and you should already know that. But yes, I believe our LEOs should be given the tools necessary to help them go home at the end of the day. This isn't a cockfight.
Allen I asked a specific question given your introduction of the Marines into the discussion. I will be a bit more specific yet, should civilian law enforcement be allowed to operate under rules of engagement the military is. Consider the differences in the application of civil rights (4th amendment, 5th amendment......ect)
2. It's called the "fog of war". Confusion happens, to assume anything else is to be pointing the finger at someone wanting bloodshed for the sake of bloodshed. Only the most conspiratorial of conspiracy theorists would go they way of thinking that it was intentional.
"confusion"?? These are highly trained the best of the best the FBI has to offer. There were no bullets flying, (not one single shot was ever fired by these refuge protesters nor was a weapon even brandished in a threatening manner) no bombs exploding, no limbs being blown off the FBI was actually secondary and the OSP was front and center. "fog of war"......come on man kinda dramatic.
3. Snipers pull off some great shots, but even they miss. I am not familiar with the guy, he may have a twitch.
Hell of a "twitch" to miss an entire pickup at 150 yards or less.........funny the FBI kept him on active duty with that bad a "twitch".
4. All shots are fired to render a threat non-threatening. Either to kill the dumb bastard, or to scare him back to reality. Either way, the intent of rendering a threat non-threatening is the overall goal.
But the FBI do not fire "warning shots". If a shot is fired it is meant to render an individual out of action. They FBI does not try to shoot the six gun out of the gunslingers hand.
https://quizlet.com/38878558/chapter-6-criminal-justice-flash-cards/
Are federal agents ALLOWED to fire a warning shot prior to using deadly force?[FONT=hurme_no2-webfont]Agents may not fire warning shots.
[/FONT]
[FONT=hurme_no2-webfont]
[/FONT]
5. Maybe he effed up and was scared? Maybe he was trying to make sure we don't find out that he was indeed the triggerman that killed Kennedy. I can't read his mind.
Are you actually excusing why an FBI agent lied or just giving reasons? If he lied becasue he was scared becasue he "effed up" it renders all your above points kinda ineffectual right?
6. All kinds of shit gets cleaned up. What's evidence to one person is a mess to another.
So you are now making an excuse that highly trained FBI HRT teams did no know that shell casing from shots fired were considered evidence to be logged by the proper chain of command??? Come on man that is the most conspiratal of conspiracy stupidity.
7. B&C died because they made it well known that they weren't going to be taken alive. Sound familiar?
So you are still sticking with someone that killed several people to someone that never pulled a gun on law enforcemnt????? Really??? I thought you were smarter than that.
So If I grab a snickers bar and run out of a 7-11 without paying and the cop on the corner hollers at me and I holler back "you'll never take me alive copper" by your line of thinking he can draw his weapon and shoot me in the back?
And lastly, yes. I will go there. Don't take on the government with a firearm unless you are willing to pay for your stupid with your life. Right or wrong, you don't have the resources necessary to win a firefight. Ask Wacko and Ruby Ridge how that worked out for them. Learn from history.
So then why do we need the 2nd amendment????? Really please answer that one allen, if we do not have the "resources" to protect ourselves from govt tyranny why do we still have the 2nd amendment....considering why it was included on our Constitution.
Look, you are trying to paint me into a corner and say that LE, in this case, or any other can't be held accountable for mistakes. That is not my position at all. I am just saying that if you are willing to take up arms against the United States of America, its laws, government employees just trying to do their job of enforcing the law, or its citizens (that are NOT in conflict with the law)...I am not going to have much sympathy for your fate.
At this point I believe I have answered enough questions on this topic and will go back to the peanut gallery.