Spotting Scope Recommendations

CJR

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
170
Likes
3
Points
113
Location
Bismarck
What's everyone using? Looking to stay in the $800-1000 range. Do you prefer angled or straight eyepiece? Mainly going to be used in the badlands stalking. Thoughts?
 


Kurtr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
18,326
Likes
2,100
Points
758
Location
Mobridge,Sd
go on cameralandny.com look at the demos and save your self some money. Call and talk to doug they are good people to deal with. The 16-48 vortex would be a good pick. Or just mortgage the house get the swaro atx 95 with the btx .
 


sweeney

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Posts
2,796
Likes
150
Points
323
Location
mandan
I went with an Athlon Ares 15-45-65 last year for my badlands hunt pretty dang nice for the price, I went with angled which in the field on the tripod works great but if you are in a truck the straight is the way to go.
 

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,942
Likes
663
Points
448
How about a mechanically image stabilized fixed 20x zeiss? 60mm obj. skip the tripod.
 

5575

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
3,730
Likes
599
Points
433
Go buy yourself a used swaro off ebay for that price, problem solved.
 
Last edited:


USMCDI

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2015
Posts
870
Likes
24
Points
166
Location
Middle of nowhere ND
Buy once, cry once. I have 4 and wish I had just done it once and got it over with. Leupold MK4 HD gold ring 12-40x60=OK, Leica Televid 77=good, Vortex Razor 20-60x80=OK, Zeiss Diascope20-60x80=the real deal!
 

KiYi

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
96
Likes
0
Points
91
Get a Leica or Swaro and be done. If you read reviews, read real field reviews, like rokslide, Eastmans, etc. from reputable sources. If you have to stay at that price point, only one i'd buy is a Vortex razor hd.
 

5575

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
3,730
Likes
599
Points
433
Who said anything about HD? Besides HD gets thrown around way to much these days, good glass is good glass no matter what.
And to tell you the truth I did pick up an 80mm swaro first HD edition "silver" for a friend about 5 years ago for $1200.
But that scope in non HD is excellent glass and you can always find them for 750-1000.

Here you go, nice tripod as well. Only problem is now you will be bidding against a couple guys on here! ha ha ha

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Swarovski-A...428460?hash=item4b1fd261ac:g:zOkAAOSwDJlZlKAx

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Swarovski-S...472935?hash=item1c8ea83667:g:QN0AAOSw-pVZlLdR

I guess you did say for stalking so I would stay with something in that 60-65mm area sorry about that.
There was a nice gold ring on bisman last week for $500. Great glass for the back pack. Being able to go down to 12 power is really nice in low light. Wish they all did that!

Here's that one. Good deal.

https://www.bismanonline.com/mandan_nd/leupold_spotting_scope_variable_12x40
 
Last edited:

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,942
Likes
663
Points
448
If you wear glasses, the 12-40x60 Leupold is very hard to beat as they've got more eye relief than anything else I've ever used.

Angled allows you to keep a tripod lower (which means steadier) in the field but they SUCK on a window mount.
 


Norske

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
600
Likes
5
Points
143
Location
Moorhead, MN
A straight eyepiece is more intuitive to use. But for pickup use, an angled one will reqire less twisting in the truck seat. Remember the scope will swivel in its foot bracket, so the angled eyepiece doesn't have to point up, it can point sideways or anything between. I wanted to use my scope for photography as well as hunting so chose a straight one. E-search for www.betterviewdesired.com, an old birdwatcher's website with really good comparison testing of optics. The site deserves a few evenings of study, not just a couple hours. I learned there the critical part of a scope is the eyepiece (the big part is simple optics and easy to design). Swaro has the best zoom eyepiece, but the fixed power Pentax eyepieces (designed for astronomical scopes) are even better. The best scopes are astronomer scopes, but all are really big. The refractors are very heavy, and the mirror astro scopes are fragile. More recently, I learned that Vortex makes a spotter that accepts the Swaro eyepiece. That will save you hundreds of $$. Since I wanted to use one with a camera, I bought the 80mm Pentax because they make a camera mount that fits their DSLRs. And yes, eyeglasses mess up the view through great optics because of the additional air/glass interfaces.
 

Jake G

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 3, 2015
Posts
108
Likes
6
Points
108
Location
Williston
angled for the field, straight for the truck! I have an angled one and it is bunk for the truck but it works.
 

Kurtr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
18,326
Likes
2,100
Points
758
Location
Mobridge,Sd
Who said anything about HD? Besides HD gets thrown around way to much these days, good glass is good glass no matter what.
And to tell you the truth I did pick up an 80mm swaro first HD edition "silver" for a friend about 5 years ago for $1200.
But that scope in non HD is excellent glass and you can always find them for 750-1000.

Here you go, nice tripod as well. Only problem is now you will be bidding against a couple guys on here! ha ha ha

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Swarovski-A...428460?hash=item4b1fd261ac:g:zOkAAOSwDJlZlKAx

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Swarovski-S...472935?hash=item1c8ea83667:g:QN0AAOSw-pVZlLdR

I guess you did say for stalking so I would stay with something in that 60-65mm area sorry about that.
There was a nice gold ring on bisman last week for $500. Great glass for the back pack. Being able to go down to 12 power is really nice in low light. Wish they all did that!

Here's that one. Good deal.

https://www.bismanonline.com/mandan_nd/leupold_spotting_scope_variable_12x40

The mavens, vortex and others can all be had cheaper and are just as good as the older swaro my friend had that same 80 that you posted and side by side with the razor they are equal. The new ones are a different animal. The btx is a game changer. The optics world has grown leaps in the last five years. Competition is great for us as a consumer.

- - - Updated - - -

And that tripod is heavy. He carried one day and went and bought a slik
 

Whisky

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 14, 2015
Posts
1,126
Likes
111
Points
258
Regarding straight vs angled. I moved from a straight to angled spotter and i will NEVER go back. My glassing time on the ground vs pickup is probably 20:1, or more. For the little I do use it in the pickup, rotating the body so it operates similar to a straight hasn't been a problem.

- - - Updated - - -

The new 55mm Kowa is getting rave reviews and would be the perfect little spotter for the pack. It whips the Razor and competes with bigger obj Swaros.... But it's $1800.

http://blog.sandsarchery.com/2017-optics-shootout-results/

http://blog.sandsarchery.com/kowa-tsn-550-55mm-fluorite-crystal-spotting-scope-review/
 

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,942
Likes
663
Points
448
Brightness and trueness of color of those older silver Swaro's can be beaten for sure. I'm not sure that resolution can though. I'm not sure anyone has caught up to Leaded Crystal for pure visual clarity/resolution.

i have a soft spot for Zeiss Classic 10x40 and 8x32's for the same reason.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 180
  • This month: 150
  • This month: 142
  • This month: 129
  • This month: 113
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 93
  • This month: 88
  • This month: 84
  • This month: 78
Top Bottom